Breathe Oregon LUBA Appeal Webinar, with Crag, NEDC, 1000 Friends and NCA
A webinar hosted by Breathe Oregon on a LUBA (Land Use Board of Appeals) appeal challenging Portland's approval of a Prologis warehouse distribution center near Parkrose High School. Community groups argue the city failed to properly analyze off-site impacts like noise, vibration, and odor when issuing the building permit, representing environmental justice concerns for a historically marginalized community.
Summary
The webinar explains a legal challenge to a 260,000 square foot Prologis warehouse distribution center approved by Portland's Bureau of Development Services on November 28, 2023. The facility, located at the intersection of I-205 and I-84 in northeast Portland, would generate over 1,000 daily trips and include 30 freight truck parking spots. Community groups including Neighbors for Clean Air, Northwest Environmental Defense Center, Crag Law Center, and 1000 Friends of Oregon filed a LUBA appeal arguing the city failed to properly apply off-site impact standards for noise, vibration, odor, and glare.
Attorneys explained that LUBA is Oregon's specialized land use court system that reviews local government decisions for compliance with state planning goals and local regulations. The case is currently in the motion to dismiss phase, where Prologis argues the building permit isn't reviewable by LUBA because it should be a clear and objective decision. The appellants counter that ambiguity in applying off-site impact standards makes it reviewable.
Speakers emphasized this represents broader environmental justice issues, noting Oregon lacks a state-level environmental policy act like neighboring states. The warehouse would be built in a community with high rates of people of color that has historically borne disproportionate pollution burdens. Despite comprehensive plan language about environmental justice, the city has minimal notification requirements for EG2 zoned properties.
Community members described two years of unsuccessful attempts to engage the city before pursuing legal action. Prologis has been unresponsive to community concerns, claiming they cannot predict impacts since they don't know future tenants. The school district requested the permit be withdrawn but received no response from Commissioner Rubio's office. If successful, the appeal would remand the decision back to the Bureau of Development Services for proper off-site impact analysis.
Key Insights
- Mary Stites explains that EG2 zoning has really minimal notification and outreach obligations from the city, meaning when something is base zoned under EG2, the city does not have very many obligations for community notification
- Eric Gren describes LUBA as a special forum created by the state to challenge land use decisions made by local governments, composed of three attorneys appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate
- Rhea Dwight argues that Oregon's lack of a state-level Environmental Policy Act means they don't have tools like California and Washington to analyze environmental effects, human health impacts, and environmental justice considerations for localized projects
- Rhea Dwight points out there is a clear correlation between areas with higher concentrations of people of color in Portland and the location of top 10 emitting facilities, showing environmental justice patterns
- Eric Gren states that Portland city code has provisions for off-site impacts standards for noise, vibration, odor and glare that apply to non-residential uses like warehouses, but the city didn't thoroughly apply them when issuing the permit
- Mary Penfield reveals they've provided about $100,000 of free legal services on this case, demonstrating the significant resources required for community legal advocacy
- Sam Dykstra from 1000 Friends notes that over 4,000 residents have signed a petition opposing this warehouse, and describes it as part of a pattern of pollution sources going into communities of color across East Portland
- Lynn from Argay Terrace explains that Prologis's response to community concerns has been to claim they can't tell residents anything about impacts because they don't know who will rent the space, despite being a global multi-billion dollar company
- Superintendent Michael Bacon reveals that Prologis approached the school district about a good neighbor agreement, but the district refused to have discussions unless the community was involved in how the site would be used
- Lynn argues that the Economic Opportunity Analysis classifies warehouses as providing 'good paying jobs' for high school graduates, but questions this methodology and notes warehouse developments are repeatedly placed in communities of mostly black and brown residents
- Sam Dykstra points out that the City of Eugene has created proactive protections requiring automatic protection checklists when industrial land is within buffer zones of residential areas or schools
- Mary Stites notes that a major limitation in regulating warehouse impacts is that diesel truck emissions fall under non-point source pollution, which DEQ and EPA don't have explicit programs to regulate like other industrial facilities
Topics
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to Access