what a real winning creative actually looks like
A winning creative must earn the right to scale by spending at least $500 and maintaining a cost per acquisition (CPA) below the target threshold. True winners demonstrate consistent performance across multiple scaling methods, geographies, and audiences, indicating genuine viability rather than luck.
Summary
The speaker explains that a winning creative is not simply an ad that performs well, but rather one that has proven itself through sufficient testing spend and consistent customer acquisition costs. The foundational requirement is a minimum of $500 in total spend on a particular creative to establish statistical validity. Beyond spend threshold, the creative must achieve a CPA that aligns with the business's target acquisition cost, which should be calculated based on the business's economics and desired profit margins. The speaker provides an example where a $50 target CPA across an entire account would maintain a 30% profit margin, and offers a spreadsheet tool to help calculate specific CPA targets for different margin goals. The speaker describes the methodology for identifying true winners: when a creative that spent $500 and stayed within target CPA is duplicated into a scaling campaign (CBO), it should immediately capture roughly 50% of spend and continue performing profitably. A genuine winning creative will then be tested across multiple scaling approaches—such as bid caps, cost caps, and cost per result—and will consistently outperform across different countries, geographies, and demographic segments. The speaker emphasizes that this multi-method validation is the ultimate proof of a true winner, as luck-based performance would not replicate reliably across such varied testing conditions.
Key Insights
- The speaker defines a winning creative not by performance alone, but by having spent enough money ($500 minimum) to prove statistical validity and return enough new customers to justify scaling within target KPIs.
- The speaker uses a personal rule requiring creatives to maintain a CPA under their target threshold, with the example that maintaining a $50 CPA across an entire account yields a 30% profit margin.
- The speaker describes true winners as creatives that, when duplicated into a scaling campaign, immediately claim approximately 50% of spend and outperform the initial testing campaign.
- The speaker argues that genuine winning creatives prove themselves by working reliably across multiple scaling methods including bid caps, cost caps, cost per result, different countries, and different demographic segments.
- The speaker emphasizes that consistent performance across diverse testing variables (method, geography, audience) is the definitive indicator of a true winning creative versus a lucky outlier.
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] If there's one thing I should tell you guys about creative testing, they have to [ __ ] earn the right to scale. All a winning creative means is [music] you have spent enough money on a particular creative and it has returned you enough new customers that it allows you to be able to scale that within your target KPIs. And my rule that I use personally on stores [music] is $500 in total spend. Second thing that I'm looking for is under my target cost per acquisition. So let's say my target acquisition based off my own economic I need to get a $50 CPA. If I get a $50 CPA and I maintain [0:30] that average…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Mark Builds Brands
Why You Need to Detach From Your Results
The speaker argues that attachment to outcomes in new ventures causes emotional distress and counterintuitively pushes success away. By setting low expectations, focusing only on controllable factors like effort and process, and detaching from results, you can both enjoy the journey more and paradoxically improve your chances of success.
run more ads
The speaker argues that successful advertising strategy prioritizes spending volume over metrics like ROAS, claiming that total ad spend is the ultimate indicator of brand success. The philosophy distinguishes between experienced advertisers ('savages') who focus on spending capacity and novices ('noobs') who obsess over profitability metrics.
Take bigger swings
The speaker advocates for making bold, significant changes when testing in marketing and business rather than small incremental tweaks. Big swings involve testing entirely new page structures, funnel architectures, and creative formats rather than minor optimizations like headline changes.
Intentional doom scrolling
To become a better advertiser, create burner social media accounts and intentionally doomscroll through content your target customers follow, focusing on organic posts rather than ads. When you notice organic content appearing repeatedly (at least three times), that signals it's worth testing as paid advertising creative.
Ai made your ads worthless
AI-generated creatives have become commoditized due to their accessibility and infinite availability, eliminating AI as a competitive moat. The real competitive advantage now lies in the strategic thinking and philosophy behind creatives, with quality and deep understanding of why ads work being the primary differentiators.