16 ways to f*ck up your ad account
The speaker outlines 16 common mistakes that can damage ad account performance, ranging from emotional decision-making and poor scaling practices to lack of creative diversity and missing technical tracking setups. The list blends strategic errors with operational oversights. It serves as a rapid-fire checklist of pitfalls for paid media managers.
Summary
In a concise, fast-paced video, the speaker rattles off 16 distinct ways advertisers commonly sabotage their own ad accounts. The mistakes span both strategic and technical categories.
On the strategic side, the speaker criticizes emotionally-driven ad decisions, treating daily budgets with the volatility of day trading, and scaling campaigns too aggressively or too quickly. They also warn against constantly shifting strategy based on social media influencers — specifically calling out '19-year-olds on Instagram' — and against taking advice from Facebook representatives.
From a creative standpoint, the speaker flags several pitfalls: only testing minor variations rather than distinct concepts, relying on the same creative angle for extended periods (citing 8 months as an example), allowing a single creative to carry the weight of an entire account, and copying competitor ads one-to-one without adaptation.
Operationally, the speaker highlights mistakes like not running enough ads, not giving ads sufficient time to spend and optimize, and failing to properly warm up a new ad account. They also caution against testing non-compliant content.
Finally, on the technical and organizational side, the speaker emphasizes the absence of naming conventions, no third-party tracking setup, and missing UTM parameters as critical oversights that undermine campaign measurement and accountability.
Key Insights
- The speaker argues that killing ads based on emotions — rather than data — is one of the primary ways advertisers destroy their own account performance.
- The speaker criticizes advertisers who change their entire strategy every time a teenage influencer on Instagram promotes a new approach, implying that reactive strategy shifts are a major account killer.
- The speaker claims that asking Facebook reps for advice is itself a mistake, implying their recommendations are unreliable or self-serving.
- The speaker argues that over-reliance on a single high-performing creative — letting one ad carry the entire account — is a structural vulnerability rather than a success.
- The speaker lists the absence of UTMs, no third-party tracking, and no naming conventions as foundational technical failures that compound all other mistakes in an ad account.
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] Here are 16 ways to [ __ ] up your ad account. Killing ads based on your emotions. Treating your daily budget like day trading. Not giving ads enough time to spend. Scaling too fast. Changing your strategy every time some 19-year-old on IG tells you to. Asking the Facebook rep what to do. Only testing variations. Using the same creative angle for 8 months straight. Letting one creative carry the entire account. Ripping ads one to one. Not running enough ads. Not warming up your ad account. testing non-compliant [ __ ] [0:31] No naming conventions, no third-party tracking setup, and last but not least, no UTMs.
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Mark Builds Brands
the ad styles that actually print
The speaker discusses which ad formats perform well across markets, highlighting native statics, AI animation, and UGC as generally effective options. However, success ultimately depends on testing and understanding your specific target demographic's native content consumption patterns.
how to make ads that actually print
The speaker identifies two critical mistakes in native static ad campaigns: treating ads like content and overestimating creative importance. For native statics, copy is the primary persuasion tool, and most advertisers fail by not testing enough variations and using poor funnel architecture.
How to structure your post purchase upsell
Effective post-purchase upsell (OTO) pages require connecting the main product to complementary products by addressing customer needs strategically. Two proven frameworks are offering more of the same product at a discount, or creating an OTO 1 that solves a new problem created by the front-end product.
how to turn 1 winning ad into 30 variations
The key to scaling ad creative isn't finding one winning ad, but rather identifying the winning sales message behind it and then transmuting that message across multiple formats and variations. A single winning VSL can generate 30+ testable ad variations by extracting core variables and adapting them across different creative formats.
ABO vs CBO for creative testing, which is better?
The speaker discusses CBO (Campaign Budget Optimization) challenges in creative testing, recommending a minimum allocation of $50 per day per ad to prevent budget spreading. They explain that budget must scale proportionally with new ad sets, and suggest moving to ABO (Ad Set Budget Optimization) if managing too many ads becomes problematic.