16 ways to f*ck up your ad account
The speaker outlines 16 common mistakes that can damage ad account performance, ranging from emotional decision-making and poor scaling practices to lack of creative diversity and missing technical tracking setups. The list blends strategic errors with operational oversights. It serves as a rapid-fire checklist of pitfalls for paid media managers.
Summary
In a concise, fast-paced video, the speaker rattles off 16 distinct ways advertisers commonly sabotage their own ad accounts. The mistakes span both strategic and technical categories.
On the strategic side, the speaker criticizes emotionally-driven ad decisions, treating daily budgets with the volatility of day trading, and scaling campaigns too aggressively or too quickly. They also warn against constantly shifting strategy based on social media influencers — specifically calling out '19-year-olds on Instagram' — and against taking advice from Facebook representatives.
From a creative standpoint, the speaker flags several pitfalls: only testing minor variations rather than distinct concepts, relying on the same creative angle for extended periods (citing 8 months as an example), allowing a single creative to carry the weight of an entire account, and copying competitor ads one-to-one without adaptation.
Operationally, the speaker highlights mistakes like not running enough ads, not giving ads sufficient time to spend and optimize, and failing to properly warm up a new ad account. They also caution against testing non-compliant content.
Finally, on the technical and organizational side, the speaker emphasizes the absence of naming conventions, no third-party tracking setup, and missing UTM parameters as critical oversights that undermine campaign measurement and accountability.
Key Insights
- The speaker argues that killing ads based on emotions — rather than data — is one of the primary ways advertisers destroy their own account performance.
- The speaker criticizes advertisers who change their entire strategy every time a teenage influencer on Instagram promotes a new approach, implying that reactive strategy shifts are a major account killer.
- The speaker claims that asking Facebook reps for advice is itself a mistake, implying their recommendations are unreliable or self-serving.
- The speaker argues that over-reliance on a single high-performing creative — letting one ad carry the entire account — is a structural vulnerability rather than a success.
- The speaker lists the absence of UTMs, no third-party tracking, and no naming conventions as foundational technical failures that compound all other mistakes in an ad account.
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] Here are 16 ways to [ __ ] up your ad account. Killing ads based on your emotions. Treating your daily budget like day trading. Not giving ads enough time to spend. Scaling too fast. Changing your strategy every time some 19-year-old on IG tells you to. Asking the Facebook rep what to do. Only testing variations. Using the same creative angle for 8 months straight. Letting one creative carry the entire account. Ripping ads one to one. Not running enough ads. Not warming up your ad account. testing non-compliant [ __ ] [0:31] No naming conventions, no third-party tracking setup, and last but not least, no UTMs.
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Mark Builds Brands
Fear is not real
The speaker argues that fear is not real but rather a physiological survival response, and that true danger lies in discomfort and stagnation. Growth only occurs by pushing beyond one's comfort zone, and avoiding risks leads to a life of regret and mediocrity.
your friends are the reason you're still broke
The speaker argues that achieving ambitious goals requires mentally compartmentalizing from friends who pull you toward mediocrity and the willingness to say no to social invitations. True friends are those who respect your mission and stay despite repeated rejections, while those who don't understand your goals will naturally fall away.
f*ck aesthetics. do what converts.
A marketing professional argues that aesthetic preferences are irrelevant in business—only conversion metrics and data matter. Direct response marketing prioritizes tangible results like sales and leads over design appeal.
chasing goals is keeping you miserable
The speaker argues that goal-setting should be reframed to emphasize enjoying the process rather than fixating on the destination, as accomplishing goals provides only fleeting satisfaction while the process comprises 99% of the journey. Success comes from those who love the work itself, not those suffering through it solely for the end result.
why r3tarded people are richer than you
The speaker argues that people with less intelligence, experience, and knowledge are outearning viewers because they take action rather than passively consuming content. The core message is that execution and risk-taking matter more than theoretical knowledge or intelligence.