11Science based lifters...
A brief comedic exchange where someone responds with exaggerated offense to being asked if they're a 'science-based lifter,' treating it as an insult.
Summary
This short transcript captures what appears to be a humorous or satirical conversation about fitness culture. When asked if he's a 'science-based lifter,' Mark responds with mock outrage, treating the question as a serious insult rather than a legitimate inquiry about his training approach. He escalates his reaction dramatically, threatening consequences if such an 'accusation' is made again and claiming to take the label very seriously. The response becomes increasingly aggressive and absurd, with Mark pointing to his physical attributes (specifically his trapezius muscles) as evidence of his capability for intimidation, and ending with crude threats. The exchange appears to be either genuine anger over fitness terminology or, more likely, a parody of how some people in fitness communities react to different training philosophies.
Key Insights
- Mark treats being called a 'science-based lifter' as a serious insult worthy of threatening consequences
- Mark claims his trapezius muscle development demonstrates his physical intimidation capabilities
- Mark suggests that questioning his training methodology crosses a line that could lead to physical confrontation
- Mark implies there are different categories of lifters and being labeled as 'science-based' is particularly offensive to him
- Mark escalates from mock offense to crude threats when discussing fitness training approaches
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] Mark, are you a science-based lifter? Listen, man. I'm going to let that one slide, but if you ever make another accusation like that again, we're going to have a problem. I take that very seriously. You would say something so insulting to me. That's not cool. Don't you see how big my traps are, man? I could [ __ ] you up. You watch your [ __ ] mouth, man.
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Mark Builds Brands
How to create S tier winners
To create S tier creatives, it's essential to understand your customer deeply and to analyze existing winning ads to identify effective variables that can be combined into new concepts. This iterative testing approach allows marketers to refine their creatives using insights gained from lower-tier ads.
AI is not the problem, your skillset is
The speaker emphasizes that limitations in utilizing AI stem from individuals' skillsets rather than the capabilities of AI itself. They argue that by effectively communicating and solving problems with AI, anyone can leverage its potential to build innovative solutions.
why you need to remove metadata from AI ads
The speaker argues that removing metadata from AI ads reduces CPM and alleviates concerns about performance issues related to AI. It is quick and easy to implement, making it a practical decision for advertisers.
why your facebook CPMs are so high
High Facebook CPMs are influenced by multiple variables including creatives, landing page design, geographic targeting, and account spend history. The speaker recommends a systematic testing approach to isolate which factor is the primary driver of elevated costs.
the least important part of ecom when getting started
The speaker argues that branding is overemphasized by new e-commerce entrepreneurs and should not be a priority until reaching $300K+ monthly revenue. Instead, early-stage businesses should focus exclusively on finding winning products, converting ads, and profitable funnels.