#480 — The Economics of Everything
Sam Harris interviews economist Noah Smith about the U.S. national debt, covering its mechanics, risks, and potential solutions. They discuss how rising interest rates compound debt problems, the failure of MMT as a framework, and why a combination of tax increases and spending cuts is necessary. The conversation also briefly touches on how smartphones have damaged society.
Summary
The conversation opens with Noah Smith's background: physics major, time in Japan, PhD in economics from University of Michigan, brief career as a finance professor at Stony Brook, and then a transition to writing on Substack at 'Noahpinion.'
The bulk of the discussion centers on the U.S. national debt. Smith explains that the U.S. has shifted from being a relatively low-debt country to a high-debt one, particularly after the Great Recession and COVID spending. The core danger is a self-reinforcing cycle: as investors demand higher interest rates to buy government bonds, the government must roll over its entire debt stock at those higher rates, increasing annual interest costs. To cover those costs, the government borrows even more, which further erodes investor confidence. The endpoint is either fiscal austerity, inflation (potentially hyperinflation), or default.
Smith explains that the U.S. dollar's reserve currency status is both a buffer and a liability — it gives the U.S. more rope, but a collapse would be more globally catastrophic as a result. He notes that warning signs to watch are rising long-term bond interest rates combined with a weakening dollar, which together signal capital flight.
The conversation addresses Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), which Smith dismisses harshly. He argues MMT functions more like a guru-led belief system than a rigorous economic framework, with no transparent methodology, and that its proponents lost credibility when inflation rose in 2021-22 and its chief figures simply issued new pronouncements without systematic justification.
Smith outlines five potential escape routes from the debt crisis: (1) growing out of it via GDP expansion and immigration of high-skilled workers; (2) inflating it away, which he notes partially happened during Biden's presidency but caused significant public anger; (3) fiscal austerity through tax hikes and spending restraint; (4) financial repression; and (5) default or restructuring. He strongly favors a combination of growth and austerity, arguing taxes need to rise not just on the wealthy but on the middle class as well, and that healthcare spending growth must be curtailed.
Smith also notes a missed opportunity: when interest rates were at historic lows, the U.S. should have locked in long-maturity debt (e.g., 20-year bonds) but instead kept the average maturity around 4.3 years, leaving the country exposed to rate increases. He speculates Trump may be inclined toward monetary financing of debt (effectively printing money), which historically leads to hyperinflation, but suggests JD Vance would bear the political consequences and may resist it.
The transcript ends with a brief, disconnected remark — apparently from a different episode segment — in which a speaker argues that smartphones have harmed society in three ways: replacing in-person interaction, degrading democracy by amplifying bad actors, and accelerating fertility decline.
Key Insights
- Noah Smith argues that there is no identifiable debt-to-GDP threshold at which a crisis becomes inevitable — the tipping point is entirely expectation-based, determined by when creditors like banks, foreign governments, and individuals collectively decide to stop buying U.S. bonds, making it inherently unpredictable.
- Smith characterizes Modern Monetary Theory as a guru-driven belief system rather than a rigorous framework, pointing out that its proponents cannot be falsified — any outside interpretation can be dismissed as incorrect, and key figures like Warren Mosler simply issued new pronouncements when inflation rose in 2021-22 without any transparent analytical process.
- Smith argues that the U.S. missed a critical opportunity during the era of near-zero interest rates to lock in long-term debt (e.g., 20-year bonds), instead maintaining an average debt maturity of only about 4.3 years, which left the country highly exposed when rates subsequently rose.
- Smith contends that meaningful fiscal austerity must include tax increases on the middle class — not just billionaires and corporations — because that is how European countries manage their finances, and neither major U.S. political party is currently willing to advocate for this.
- Smith suggests Trump may be temperamentally inclined toward having the Federal Reserve monetize government debt (effectively money printing), drawing a parallel to Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, where the inflationary consequences outlasted the leader who initiated the policy — leaving successors like Maduro to manage the fallout.
Topics
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to Access