MacroVoices #474 Mike Alkin: Uranium Supply Is In Structural Deficit And The Fuel Buyers Don’t “Get It”!
Hedge fund manager Mike Alkin argues that despite bearish uranium spot prices, the structural supply deficit remains intact with term prices at 17-year highs. He contends that spot markets (26% of trading) are dominated by traders while utilities contract in term markets (75% of trading) where real supply-demand fundamentals show chronic shortages requiring $90-120/pound uranium to incentivize new production.
Summary
Mike Alkin from Sachem Cove Capital addresses the apparent contradiction between excellent nuclear industry news flow and poor uranium investment performance. He distinguishes between spot uranium prices (currently around $65, representing only 26% of market volume with utilities comprising just 4% of spot buyers) and term contract prices (representing 75%+ of actual uranium transactions, currently at 17-year highs around $80). Alkin argues the market incorrectly focuses on volatile spot prices rather than term pricing that reflects true supply-demand fundamentals.
Regarding supply deficits, Alkin dismisses narratives about Russian uranium flooding markets post-Ukraine war, noting Russia is actually a net uranium importer. He explains that major new supply repeatedly fails to materialize - brownfield projects originally expected to produce 8 million pounds annually have delivered only 50% of promised output with costs 50% higher than projected. Projects like NextGen's Arrow are delayed until 2030-2031, not the mid-2020s as originally promised.
Alkin describes utility buyers as nuclear engineers who aren't incentivized to trade commodities and have historically ignored economic fundamentals. He recounts being dismissed by utility buyers at industry conferences in 2018-2019 when warning of coming shortages. Current replacement rate contracting runs at only 40% of consumption needs while inventories have been depleted. Alkin predicts when utilities finally recognize the structural deficit reality, panic contracting will drive prices to $90-120+ per pound needed to incentivize new mine development, potentially creating a FOMO situation where utilities rush to secure 20-year supply contracts.
About this episode
MacroVoices Erik Townsend & Patrick Ceresna welcome, Mike Alkin. They’ll begin by exploring how it’s even possible that investor sentiment remains so negative, despite what has arguably been the most bullish year ever for nuclear energy news. From there, they’ll dive into a range of topics currently shaping the uranium market. https://bit.ly/42fV8fs 🔻Download Big Picture Trading Chartbook 📈📉: https://bit.ly/3E86j1F ✅Sign up for a FREE 14-day trial at Big Picture Trading: https://bit.ly/4cMmu0d 🔴 Subscribe to Patrick’s Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Patrick_Ceresna 🔴 Subscribe to Erik's Substack: https://eriktownsend.substack.com/ 🔴 Check out Energy Transition Crisis on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@EnergyTransitionCrisis1 Please visit our website https://www.macrovoices.com to register your free account to gain access to supporting materials
Key Insights
- Spot uranium prices represent only 26% of market volume while term contracts account for 75%+ of transactions, yet investors focus on the less meaningful spot price reported daily
- Term uranium pricing reached 17-year highs at $80/pound with fixed pricing, while market-related contracts have ceilings of $120-135 and floors around $65-68
- Utility buyers comprise only 4% of spot market purchases, making spot prices largely irrelevant to actual supply-demand fundamentals
- Russia is a net uranium importer despite controlling 40% of enrichment capacity, contradicting beliefs that ending Ukraine war will flood uranium markets
- Expected brownfield uranium production of 8 million pounds annually has delivered only 50% of promised output with costs 50% higher than projected
- Major uranium projects like NextGen's Arrow have been delayed from mid-2020s to 2030-2031, with no major new supply materializing as promised
- Utility replacement rate contracting runs at only 40% of consumption needs while inventories have been largely depleted over the past decade
- Nuclear fuel buyers are engineers not traders, lacking commercial incentives to buy low and historically dismissing economic warnings about supply shortages
- Term market volumes declined 25% last year while prices rose 17%, indicating insufficient economically viable supply when demand exists
- Current uranium prices need to reach $90-120/pound to incentivize new mine development, based on updated all-in sustaining cost analysis
- Kazakh producer Kazatomprom's costs increased from projected $11.50 to $30/pound despite currency depreciation that should have lowered costs
- When utilities eventually recognize structural deficits, panic contracting for 10-20 year supply agreements could drive prices far above incentive levels, similar to 2006-2007 cycle
Topics
Transcript
This is Macro Voices, the free weekly financial podcast targeting professional finance, high net worth individuals, family offices, and other sophisticated investors. Macro Voices is all about the brightest minds in the world of finance and macroeconomics telling it like it is, bullish or bearish, no holds barred. Now, here are your hosts, Eric Townsend and Patrick Ceresna. Macro Voices episode 474 was produced on April 3rd, 2025. I'm Eric Townsend. Sachem Cove Capital co-founder and hedge fund manager Mike Alkin returns as this week's feature interview guest, and the topic du jour will be what the hell is going on in the uranium market. I'll start by asking Mike to explain how it's even possible that we're experiencing horrific…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Macro Voices
MacroVoices #554 Yasir Arafat: Mass Manufacturing Nuclear Power Plants
Yasser Arafat, CTO of Allo Atomics, discusses the company's plans to mass-produce advanced nuclear reactors at scale, arguing that cost-competitive nuclear energy (cheaper than coal and gas) could be achieved within years, not decades, by leveraging manufacturing principles similar to Tesla's approach. He addresses fuel supply chain constraints, nuclear waste recycling potential, and competitive threats from China while outlining a pathway to transition global energy systems away from fossil fuels.
MacroVoices #553 Brent Johnson: Disparate Housewives
Brent Johnson discusses the dollar's breakout above 102, analyzing why the greenback continues strengthening despite expectations for decline, while also exploring the deepening coordination between the Federal Reserve and Treasury Department in what he calls the "Disparate Housewives" framework. He argues the US remains positioned to weather higher rates better than other economies, and frames the current geopolitical environment as analogous to the early Cold War era with China rather than a replay of the 1970s.
MacroVoices #552 David Rosenberg: Navigating The Noise
David Rosenberg argues that inflation concerns are overblown despite recent energy price spikes, contending that without wage pressures entering the labor market, price shocks will remain transitory. He identifies the November 3rd midterm elections and November 4th Treasury refunding announcement as pivotal catalysts that could trigger significant bond market rallies and economic slowdown as fiscal stimulus ends and gridlock returns.
MacroVoices #551 Michael Every: Decoding The Global Geopolitical Puzzle (Part 2)
Michael Every from Rabobank discusses the interconnected geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and China, analyzing how conflicts in Ukraine, the Middle East, and potential Taiwan invasion scenarios serve as strategic moves in a broader great power competition. He examines emerging policy shifts including potential diesel export bans, AI arms races, and nuclear escalation risks while arguing that national security concerns are overriding traditional free market economics.
MacroVoices #551 Michael Every: Decoding The Global Geopolitical Puzzle
Michael Every of Rabobank discusses interconnected geopolitical crises spanning Iran, Ukraine, and the Middle East, arguing that oil prices don't reflect true disruption risks and that energy will increasingly become a tool of statecraft. The conversation covers potential diesel shortages, U.S. policy responses, the Greenland-Denmark security deal, and China's strategic positioning amid global instability.