MacroVoices #474 Mike Alkin: Uranium Supply Is In Structural Deficit And The Fuel Buyers Don’t “Get It”!
Hedge fund manager Mike Alkin argues that despite bearish uranium spot prices, the structural supply deficit remains intact with term prices at 17-year highs. He contends that spot markets (26% of trading) are dominated by traders while utilities contract in term markets (75% of trading) where real supply-demand fundamentals show chronic shortages requiring $90-120/pound uranium to incentivize new production.
Summary
Mike Alkin from Sachem Cove Capital addresses the apparent contradiction between excellent nuclear industry news flow and poor uranium investment performance. He distinguishes between spot uranium prices (currently around $65, representing only 26% of market volume with utilities comprising just 4% of spot buyers) and term contract prices (representing 75%+ of actual uranium transactions, currently at 17-year highs around $80). Alkin argues the market incorrectly focuses on volatile spot prices rather than term pricing that reflects true supply-demand fundamentals.
Regarding supply deficits, Alkin dismisses narratives about Russian uranium flooding markets post-Ukraine war, noting Russia is actually a net uranium importer. He explains that major new supply repeatedly fails to materialize - brownfield projects originally expected to produce 8 million pounds annually have delivered only 50% of promised output with costs 50% higher than projected. Projects like NextGen's Arrow are delayed until 2030-2031, not the mid-2020s as originally promised.
Alkin describes utility buyers as nuclear engineers who aren't incentivized to trade commodities and have historically ignored economic fundamentals. He recounts being dismissed by utility buyers at industry conferences in 2018-2019 when warning of coming shortages. Current replacement rate contracting runs at only 40% of consumption needs while inventories have been depleted. Alkin predicts when utilities finally recognize the structural deficit reality, panic contracting will drive prices to $90-120+ per pound needed to incentivize new mine development, potentially creating a FOMO situation where utilities rush to secure 20-year supply contracts.
About this episode
MacroVoices Erik Townsend & Patrick Ceresna welcome, Mike Alkin. They’ll begin by exploring how it’s even possible that investor sentiment remains so negative, despite what has arguably been the most bullish year ever for nuclear energy news. From there, they’ll dive into a range of topics currently shaping the uranium market. https://bit.ly/42fV8fs 🔻Download Big Picture Trading Chartbook 📈📉: https://bit.ly/3E86j1F ✅Sign up for a FREE 14-day trial at Big Picture Trading: https://bit.ly/4cMmu0d 🔴 Subscribe to Patrick’s Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Patrick_Ceresna 🔴 Subscribe to Erik's Substack: https://eriktownsend.substack.com/ 🔴 Check out Energy Transition Crisis on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@EnergyTransitionCrisis1 Please visit our website https://www.macrovoices.com to register your free account to gain access to supporting materials
Key Insights
- Spot uranium prices represent only 26% of market volume while term contracts account for 75%+ of transactions, yet investors focus on the less meaningful spot price reported daily
- Term uranium pricing reached 17-year highs at $80/pound with fixed pricing, while market-related contracts have ceilings of $120-135 and floors around $65-68
- Utility buyers comprise only 4% of spot market purchases, making spot prices largely irrelevant to actual supply-demand fundamentals
- Russia is a net uranium importer despite controlling 40% of enrichment capacity, contradicting beliefs that ending Ukraine war will flood uranium markets
- Expected brownfield uranium production of 8 million pounds annually has delivered only 50% of promised output with costs 50% higher than projected
- Major uranium projects like NextGen's Arrow have been delayed from mid-2020s to 2030-2031, with no major new supply materializing as promised
- Utility replacement rate contracting runs at only 40% of consumption needs while inventories have been largely depleted over the past decade
- Nuclear fuel buyers are engineers not traders, lacking commercial incentives to buy low and historically dismissing economic warnings about supply shortages
- Term market volumes declined 25% last year while prices rose 17%, indicating insufficient economically viable supply when demand exists
- Current uranium prices need to reach $90-120/pound to incentivize new mine development, based on updated all-in sustaining cost analysis
- Kazakh producer Kazatomprom's costs increased from projected $11.50 to $30/pound despite currency depreciation that should have lowered costs
- When utilities eventually recognize structural deficits, panic contracting for 10-20 year supply agreements could drive prices far above incentive levels, similar to 2006-2007 cycle
Topics
Transcript
This is Macro Voices, the free weekly financial podcast targeting professional finance, high net worth individuals, family offices, and other sophisticated investors. Macro Voices is all about the brightest minds in the world of finance and macroeconomics telling it like it is, bullish or bearish, no holds barred. Now, here are your hosts, Eric Townsend and Patrick Ceresna. Macro Voices episode 474 was produced on April 3rd, 2025. I'm Eric Townsend. Sachem Cove Capital co-founder and hedge fund manager Mike Alkin returns as this week's feature interview guest, and the topic du jour will be what the hell is going on in the uranium market. I'll start by asking Mike to explain how it's even possible that we're experiencing horrific…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Macro Voices
MacroVoices #541 Dr. Anas Alhajji: Bab el-Mandeb: The Next Oil Chokepoint Nobody's Watching
Dr. Anas Al-Hajji argues that the U.S. intentionally closed the Strait of Hormuz to demonstrate energy and AI dominance to China, but the closure became uncontrollable when IRGC extremist factions refused to cooperate with negotiators seeking to reopen it. The real vulnerability now lies in refined petroleum products and the Strait of Bab el-Mandeb, with LNG and coal emerging as investment winners in a world prioritizing energy security.
MacroVoices #540 Adam Parker: Beyond the AI Bubble: Diversifying Portfolios in an Earnings-Driven Market
Adam Parker of Trivariate Research discusses a U.S. equity market supported by strong earnings growth rather than bubble dynamics, advocates for portfolio diversification away from concentrated AI/semiconductor exposure into energy and healthcare, and analyzes how geopolitical risks like the Hormuz crisis are unlikely to meaningfully impact equity fundamentals.
MacroVoices #539 Rory Johnston: Hormuz Crisis, is it Really Over?
Rory Johnston discusses how the Strait of Hormuz crisis has evolved from an expected supply shock into a managed situation through Chinese demand destruction and SPR releases, resulting in unexpected crude oil contango despite four months of closure. The petroleum market shows a critical split where refined products remain tight while crude oil faces downward pressure from oversupply that refineries cannot fully process.
MacroVoices #538 Lyn Alden: Is The War Really Over and What’s Next For Markets?
Lyn Alden discusses the Iran conflict resolution, Federal Reserve policy under new leadership, persistent U.S. fiscal deficits, the AI investment boom and its sustainability, stablecoin growth, and energy demands for AI infrastructure. She argues that while the conflict appears to be ending, significant negotiation details remain unresolved, and that fiscal dominance—not monetary policy—remains the primary driver of asset markets.
MacroVoices #536 Larry Mcdonald: The Migration is Upon us
In Macro Voices Episode 536, Larry McDonald discusses the current market dynamics amidst escalating geopolitical tensions and major upcoming IPOs, emphasizing a potential shift from crowded growth sectors to value and hard assets. He highlights the impact of insider selling and the likelihood of a continued inflationary environment, suggesting significant trading opportunities in healthcare and energy sectors.