MacroVoices #474 Mike Alkin: Uranium Supply Is In Structural Deficit And The Fuel Buyers Don’t “Get It”!
Hedge fund manager Mike Alkin argues that despite bearish uranium spot prices, the structural supply deficit remains intact with term prices at 17-year highs. He contends that spot markets (26% of trading) are dominated by traders while utilities contract in term markets (75% of trading) where real supply-demand fundamentals show chronic shortages requiring $90-120/pound uranium to incentivize new production.
Summary
Mike Alkin from Sachem Cove Capital addresses the apparent contradiction between excellent nuclear industry news flow and poor uranium investment performance. He distinguishes between spot uranium prices (currently around $65, representing only 26% of market volume with utilities comprising just 4% of spot buyers) and term contract prices (representing 75%+ of actual uranium transactions, currently at 17-year highs around $80). Alkin argues the market incorrectly focuses on volatile spot prices rather than term pricing that reflects true supply-demand fundamentals.
Regarding supply deficits, Alkin dismisses narratives about Russian uranium flooding markets post-Ukraine war, noting Russia is actually a net uranium importer. He explains that major new supply repeatedly fails to materialize - brownfield projects originally expected to produce 8 million pounds annually have delivered only 50% of promised output with costs 50% higher than projected. Projects like NextGen's Arrow are delayed until 2030-2031, not the mid-2020s as originally promised.
Alkin describes utility buyers as nuclear engineers who aren't incentivized to trade commodities and have historically ignored economic fundamentals. He recounts being dismissed by utility buyers at industry conferences in 2018-2019 when warning of coming shortages. Current replacement rate contracting runs at only 40% of consumption needs while inventories have been depleted. Alkin predicts when utilities finally recognize the structural deficit reality, panic contracting will drive prices to $90-120+ per pound needed to incentivize new mine development, potentially creating a FOMO situation where utilities rush to secure 20-year supply contracts.
About this episode
MacroVoices Erik Townsend & Patrick Ceresna welcome, Mike Alkin. They’ll begin by exploring how it’s even possible that investor sentiment remains so negative, despite what has arguably been the most bullish year ever for nuclear energy news. From there, they’ll dive into a range of topics currently shaping the uranium market. https://bit.ly/42fV8fs 🔻Download Big Picture Trading Chartbook 📈📉: https://bit.ly/3E86j1F ✅Sign up for a FREE 14-day trial at Big Picture Trading: https://bit.ly/4cMmu0d 🔴 Subscribe to Patrick’s Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Patrick_Ceresna 🔴 Subscribe to Erik's Substack: https://eriktownsend.substack.com/ 🔴 Check out Energy Transition Crisis on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@EnergyTransitionCrisis1 Please visit our website https://www.macrovoices.com to register your free account to gain access to supporting materials
Key Insights
- Spot uranium prices represent only 26% of market volume while term contracts account for 75%+ of transactions, yet investors focus on the less meaningful spot price reported daily
- Term uranium pricing reached 17-year highs at $80/pound with fixed pricing, while market-related contracts have ceilings of $120-135 and floors around $65-68
- Utility buyers comprise only 4% of spot market purchases, making spot prices largely irrelevant to actual supply-demand fundamentals
- Russia is a net uranium importer despite controlling 40% of enrichment capacity, contradicting beliefs that ending Ukraine war will flood uranium markets
- Expected brownfield uranium production of 8 million pounds annually has delivered only 50% of promised output with costs 50% higher than projected
- Major uranium projects like NextGen's Arrow have been delayed from mid-2020s to 2030-2031, with no major new supply materializing as promised
- Utility replacement rate contracting runs at only 40% of consumption needs while inventories have been largely depleted over the past decade
- Nuclear fuel buyers are engineers not traders, lacking commercial incentives to buy low and historically dismissing economic warnings about supply shortages
- Term market volumes declined 25% last year while prices rose 17%, indicating insufficient economically viable supply when demand exists
- Current uranium prices need to reach $90-120/pound to incentivize new mine development, based on updated all-in sustaining cost analysis
- Kazakh producer Kazatomprom's costs increased from projected $11.50 to $30/pound despite currency depreciation that should have lowered costs
- When utilities eventually recognize structural deficits, panic contracting for 10-20 year supply agreements could drive prices far above incentive levels, similar to 2006-2007 cycle
Topics
Transcript
This is Macro Voices, the free weekly financial podcast targeting professional finance, high net worth individuals, family offices, and other sophisticated investors. Macro Voices is all about the brightest minds in the world of finance and macroeconomics telling it like it is, bullish or bearish, no holds barred. Now, here are your hosts, Eric Townsend and Patrick Ceresna. Macro Voices episode 474 was produced on April 3rd, 2025. I'm Eric Townsend. Sachem Cove Capital co-founder and hedge fund manager Mike Alkin returns as this week's feature interview guest, and the topic du jour will be what the hell is going on in the uranium market. I'll start by asking Mike to explain how it's even possible that we're experiencing horrific…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Macro Voices
MacroVoices #547 Daniel Lacalle: The Future of Reserve Currency
Daniel Lacalle argues that governments have exceeded the three limits (economic, fiscal, and inflationary) that maintain currency credibility, threatening the U.S. dollar's reserve currency status. He contends that stablecoins and decentralized currencies will eventually replace centralized fiat systems, with the Trump administration's pro-crypto stance potentially either cementing or disrupting dollar dominance depending on fiscal prudence.
MacroVoices #546 Darius Dale: Darius Dale for POTUS 2028
In MacroVoices #546, Darius Dale discusses the current state of economic policies, financial markets, and geopolitical risks while emphasizing the significance of evolving market dynamics influenced by federal interventions. Dale's analysis highlights the potential implications for growth, inflation, and asset performance amid increasing government debt and intervention strategies.
MacroVoices #545 Michael Howell: Warsh vs. The Markets
Michael Howell discusses global liquidity cycles and their impact on asset markets, arguing that the liquidity peak in late 2025 has begun rolling over and will likely bottom in mid-to-late 2027. He contends that gold has likely bottomed and should rally significantly due to Chinese monetary expansion and Western debt monetization, while warning that equities face headwinds as bond yields rise and the Fed may need to tighten despite political pressure.
MacroVoices #544 Viktor Shvets: How Markets Survive Disruption
Viktor Shvets discusses the paradox of disinflation as the dominant long-term trend while near-term inflationary spikes persist from policy decisions, the deterioration of the Federal Reserve's independence and cohesion under Chair Kevin Warsh, escalating geopolitical conflicts with no clear resolution, and the K-shaped economy driven by AI-induced wealth concentration that is fueling dangerous levels of political polarization.
MacroVoices #543 Jim Bianco: Who Solves Inflation The FED or The Market?
In the latest Macro Voices episode, Jim Bianco discusses the Fed's recent decisions and their implications for inflation and long-term bond yields, highlighting the independence of Fed voters in the decision-making process. He argues that the bond market's reaction indicates persistent inflation concerns and that either the Fed must raise rates or the market will force higher yields.