VLC turned down $30+ million dollars to keep VLC ad-free | Lex Fridman Podcast
Jean-Baptiste Kempf, the steward of VLC media player, explains how VLC evolved from a student networking project at École Centrale Paris in the 1990s into one of the world's most widely used media players. He describes repeatedly turning down tens of millions of dollars from shady advertising companies to keep VLC free, open source, and ad-free. His motivation was rooted in ethics, personal integrity, and a sense of responsibility to the broader community of contributors.
Summary
The interview begins with Lex Fridman referencing the well-known Reddit meme about Jean-Baptiste Kempf (JB) turning down millions of dollars to keep VLC free. JB confirms the story, acknowledging he refused dozens of millions of dollars on multiple occasions, stating he did so because it was not moral and not the right thing to do.
JB then traces the unlikely origins of VLC back to the École Centrale Paris, an elite French engineering school whose campus was uniquely managed entirely by its students due to being owned by an alumni non-profit rather than the university itself. In the 1980s, IBM and 3Com sponsored a token ring network experiment on campus. By the mid-1990s, the slow token ring network became a problem as students wanted to play latency-sensitive games like Doom and Duke Nukem. Seeking a faster network, students approached the university and corporate partners, eventually connecting with the CIO of Bull, a French company, who suggested streaming satellite television over a fast campus network instead of installing individual dishes and decoders for each of the 1,500 students.
This led to the 'Network 2000' project, a rough but functional demo that crashed after 45 seconds and leaked memory — but the demo only needed to run for 40 seconds. The project used MPEG-2 video streamed over a newly built ATM network running at 155 Mbps, one of the fastest in Europe at the time. Though the project was considered complete, two students later revived the idea into the broader VideoLAN project, which took about three years to convince the university to release as open source due to concerns about IP and monetizing the MPEG-2 decoder.
JB joined the project in 2003, when he enrolled at the university, and subsequently created the VideoLAN non-profit organization to extract the project from the university and make it sustainable. He emphasizes that he did not create VLC — it emerged organically from the VideoLAN project — but he credits himself with keeping it alive during a near-death moment around 2005 when only two active developers remained. Under his stewardship, VLC grew from hundreds of thousands of users to what he estimates are billions of installations worldwide.
On the topic of the financial offers, JB explains that the deals presented to him were predominantly from shady advertising companies wanting to bundle spyware toolbars, change browser or search engine settings, or place ads inside VLC. He draws a distinction: he is not anti-money and has founded startups, but he believes money must be earned ethically. He notes that had a legitimate company like Netflix approached him about integration, the outcome might have been different. He also argues that accepting such deals would have killed the project within three years through community forking and loss of trust. The last offer he received was described as 'obscene,' and came with the rationalization that the money could fund new open source projects — a pitch he still rejected. His final reasoning was simple: he needs to be able to go to sleep at night feeling good about his decisions.
Key Insights
- JB argues that accepting the advertising deals — not just for ethical reasons but practical ones — would have killed VLC within three years, as the community would have forked the project and moved on, making the financial gain self-defeating.
- JB clarifies that he did not create VLC; it emerged organically from the VideoLAN student project, which itself grew out of the Network 2000 experiment, and he feels this lineage means he was not fully 'legitimate' to monetize it unilaterally.
- JB describes how VLC nearly died around 2005 when only two active developers remained, and that his personal decision to dedicate his life to the project is what allowed it to grow from hundreds of thousands to billions of users.
- The origins of VLC trace back to a 1994–1995 student effort to upgrade a token ring campus network so they could play Doom and Duke Nukem, which accidentally led to building one of Europe's fastest networks and pioneering local video streaming a decade before YouTube.
- JB recounts that the final and largest offer he rejected came with the persuasive rationalization that the money could be used to fund new open source projects — a 'mind trick' he found difficult but ultimately dismissed because the method of obtaining the money was still wrong.
Topics
Transcript
[0:02] So, as the legend goes, JB, you uh repeatedly turned down millions of dollars to uh keep VLC open source, free for everyone, without ads. So, take me through the reasoning behind that decision of leaving millions of dollars on the table. Yeah, that's like almost a meme, right? On on Reddit. >> There literally is a meme on Reddit. 9GAG and yeah, yeah, I See, there's you >> [laughter] [0:33] >> looking like a wizard in the in the VLC hat on Reddit. This is JB, the creator of VLC media player. He refused tens of millions of dollars in order to keep VLC as free Thanks, Jean-Baptiste Kempf. You can even summon him on Reddit. Yeah, and…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Lex Clips
Do antipsychotic drugs work? | Andrew Scull and Lex Fridman
Andrew Scull discusses the efficacy and serious side effects of antipsychotic drugs, explaining that while they help some patients, many are non-responders, and the medications carry substantial risks including tardive dyskinesia, weight gain, metabolic syndrome, and cognitive dulling. The landmark CATIE study revealed that newer, expensive second-generation antipsychotics are no more effective than older first-generation drugs, with 67-82% of patients dropping out due to inefficacy or intolerable side effects.
Surprising origin of antipsychotic drugs | Andrew Scull and Lex Fridman
Andrew Scull explains how chlorpromazine, an antihistamine synthesized in the 1880s, was accidentally discovered to have psychiatric applications in the 1950s through French Navy lieutenant Alain Laborit's experiments. The drug's rapid adoption was driven by pharmaceutical companies' aggressive marketing to politicians and hospital administrators rather than by psychiatrists' initial enthusiasm, transforming it from a 'major tranquilizer' into the first 'antipsychotic' drug.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) vs Psychoanalysis | Andrew Scull and Lex Fridman
Andrew Scull discusses how clinical psychology and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) emerged after WWII as alternatives to psychoanalysis, becoming dominant through better empirical evidence, shorter treatment duration, and federal funding advantages. CBT's symptom-focused approach proved more measurable and reproducible than psychoanalytic theory, though its effectiveness remains limited for serious mental disorders.
Do anti-depressant drugs work? | Andrew Scull and Lex Fridman
Andrew Scull discusses the history and efficacy of antidepressants, particularly SSRIs like Prozac, explaining that while they statistically outperform placebo, the clinical improvement is often marginal and comes with significant side effects including sexual dysfunction and withdrawal difficulties. He also addresses 'diagnostic creep' in psychiatry, where conditions become increasingly broadly defined and diagnosed over time.
How drugs and psycho-pharmacology changed mental health | Andrew Scull and Lex Fridman
Andrew Scull traces the accidental discovery of psychopharmacology, beginning with chlorpromazine's unexpected psychiatric effects in the 1950s, and discusses how pharmaceutical companies transformed mental health treatment while also introducing serious side effects like tardive dyskinesia and metabolic complications that remain inadequately addressed.