VLC turned down $30+ million dollars to keep VLC ad-free | Lex Fridman Podcast
Jean-Baptiste Kempf, the steward of VLC media player, explains how VLC evolved from a student networking project at École Centrale Paris in the 1990s into one of the world's most widely used media players. He describes repeatedly turning down tens of millions of dollars from shady advertising companies to keep VLC free, open source, and ad-free. His motivation was rooted in ethics, personal integrity, and a sense of responsibility to the broader community of contributors.
Summary
The interview begins with Lex Fridman referencing the well-known Reddit meme about Jean-Baptiste Kempf (JB) turning down millions of dollars to keep VLC free. JB confirms the story, acknowledging he refused dozens of millions of dollars on multiple occasions, stating he did so because it was not moral and not the right thing to do.
JB then traces the unlikely origins of VLC back to the École Centrale Paris, an elite French engineering school whose campus was uniquely managed entirely by its students due to being owned by an alumni non-profit rather than the university itself. In the 1980s, IBM and 3Com sponsored a token ring network experiment on campus. By the mid-1990s, the slow token ring network became a problem as students wanted to play latency-sensitive games like Doom and Duke Nukem. Seeking a faster network, students approached the university and corporate partners, eventually connecting with the CIO of Bull, a French company, who suggested streaming satellite television over a fast campus network instead of installing individual dishes and decoders for each of the 1,500 students.
This led to the 'Network 2000' project, a rough but functional demo that crashed after 45 seconds and leaked memory — but the demo only needed to run for 40 seconds. The project used MPEG-2 video streamed over a newly built ATM network running at 155 Mbps, one of the fastest in Europe at the time. Though the project was considered complete, two students later revived the idea into the broader VideoLAN project, which took about three years to convince the university to release as open source due to concerns about IP and monetizing the MPEG-2 decoder.
JB joined the project in 2003, when he enrolled at the university, and subsequently created the VideoLAN non-profit organization to extract the project from the university and make it sustainable. He emphasizes that he did not create VLC — it emerged organically from the VideoLAN project — but he credits himself with keeping it alive during a near-death moment around 2005 when only two active developers remained. Under his stewardship, VLC grew from hundreds of thousands of users to what he estimates are billions of installations worldwide.
On the topic of the financial offers, JB explains that the deals presented to him were predominantly from shady advertising companies wanting to bundle spyware toolbars, change browser or search engine settings, or place ads inside VLC. He draws a distinction: he is not anti-money and has founded startups, but he believes money must be earned ethically. He notes that had a legitimate company like Netflix approached him about integration, the outcome might have been different. He also argues that accepting such deals would have killed the project within three years through community forking and loss of trust. The last offer he received was described as 'obscene,' and came with the rationalization that the money could fund new open source projects — a pitch he still rejected. His final reasoning was simple: he needs to be able to go to sleep at night feeling good about his decisions.
Key Insights
- JB argues that accepting the advertising deals — not just for ethical reasons but practical ones — would have killed VLC within three years, as the community would have forked the project and moved on, making the financial gain self-defeating.
- JB clarifies that he did not create VLC; it emerged organically from the VideoLAN student project, which itself grew out of the Network 2000 experiment, and he feels this lineage means he was not fully 'legitimate' to monetize it unilaterally.
- JB describes how VLC nearly died around 2005 when only two active developers remained, and that his personal decision to dedicate his life to the project is what allowed it to grow from hundreds of thousands to billions of users.
- The origins of VLC trace back to a 1994–1995 student effort to upgrade a token ring campus network so they could play Doom and Duke Nukem, which accidentally led to building one of Europe's fastest networks and pioneering local video streaming a decade before YouTube.
- JB recounts that the final and largest offer he rejected came with the persuasive rationalization that the money could be used to fund new open source projects — a 'mind trick' he found difficult but ultimately dismissed because the method of obtaining the money was still wrong.
Topics
Transcript
[0:02] So, as the legend goes, JB, you uh repeatedly turned down millions of dollars to uh keep VLC open source, free for everyone, without ads. So, take me through the reasoning behind that decision of leaving millions of dollars on the table. Yeah, that's like almost a meme, right? On on Reddit. >> There literally is a meme on Reddit. 9GAG and yeah, yeah, I See, there's you >> [laughter] [0:33] >> looking like a wizard in the in the VLC hat on Reddit. This is JB, the creator of VLC media player. He refused tens of millions of dollars in order to keep VLC as free Thanks, Jean-Baptiste Kempf. You can even summon him on Reddit. Yeah, and…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Lex Clips
Anti-matter & nuclear weapons: Why technology is always a double-edge sword | Don Lincoln
Don Lincoln discusses how advanced energy sources like nuclear fusion, fission, and antimatter represent transformative but double-edged technologies. He argues that science's role is to understand nature, while society must collectively decide how to apply that knowledge. The conversation concludes with a celebration of humanity's innate curiosity as the driver of civilizational progress.
Why antimatter costs $63 trillion dollars to produce | Don Lincoln and Lex Fridman
Don Lincoln and Lex Fridman discuss the extreme difficulty and cost of producing antimatter, noting that Fermilab could only produce about one nanogram per year. They explore the theoretical potential of antimatter as a propulsion system for space travel, while emphasizing that the core challenge is an engineering problem of concentrating energy, not a physics breakthrough.
Is loop quantum gravity wrong? - physicist explains | Don Lincoln and Lex Fridman
Don Lincoln explains the differences between loop quantum gravity and string theory, noting that loop quantum gravity attempts to quantize space itself rather than unify all forces. He discusses how an early prediction of loop quantum gravity — that light speed would vary by frequency — was disproven by gamma ray burst observations, but the theory adapted. He also highlights the landmark gravitational wave observation confirming that gravity travels at the speed of light.
Can antimatter be used as rocket fuel? | Don Lincoln and Lex Fridman
Don Lincoln and Lex Fridman discuss the feasibility of using antimatter as rocket fuel, noting that while it is physically possible, the cost of production (estimated at $62-63 trillion per gram) and containment challenges make it impractical. Lincoln explains that antimatter propulsion is fundamentally an engineering problem rather than a physics mystery, and that breakthroughs would likely come from finding new ways to concentrate energy rather than new physics theory.
Speed of light explained: Was Einstein's theory correct? | Don Lincoln and Lex Fridman
Don Lincoln explains Einstein's special relativity, focusing on the two core premises: the universality of natural laws and the constant speed of light for all observers. He describes modern particle physics experiments that have empirically confirmed Einstein's conjecture. He also reflects on how understanding space-time makes the concept of a universal speed limit intuitive rather than bizarre.