Vikings show: How accurate is it? - Historian explains | Lars Brownworth and Lex Fridman
Historian Lars Brownworth discusses the historical accuracy of the Vikings TV series with Lex Fridman, noting that while well-done dramatically, the show takes significant liberties like making Ragnar and Rollo brothers when they were actually born 80 years apart. The conversation explores the challenges of studying Viking history due to limited historical records.
Summary
The discussion begins with an evaluation of the Vikings TV series' historical accuracy. Brownworth acknowledges the show is well-executed but points out a major historical inaccuracy: Ragnar and Rollo are portrayed as brothers in the series when historical evidence suggests they were born approximately 80 years apart. He appreciates this as a storytelling device that consolidates multiple Viking figures into a cohesive narrative centered around Ragnar.
Brownworth explains the fundamental challenge of writing about Viking history - the lack of comprehensive organizational frameworks due to severely limited historical documentation. Historians only have access to fragmentary evidence, primarily from raid accounts, which provides mere glimpses into what was likely a rich and complex civilization. This scarcity of sources makes it difficult to understand the broader historical context and development of Viking culture.
The conversation touches on deeper historical mysteries, such as the origins of Viking warrior culture and the evolution of their concepts of honor in battle. Brownworth suggests there may have been influence from Roman military traditions that traveled north to Scandinavia, though concrete evidence is lacking. The discussion concludes with an interesting historical note about the very name 'Scandinavia' originating from Roman authors who mistakenly believed it was a single island inhabited by one tribe called the Scandia.
Key Insights
- Brownworth states that Ragnar and Rollo were not actually brothers as portrayed in the Vikings series, but were born 80 years apart according to some historical accounts
- Brownworth explains that the Vikings TV series consolidates all major Viking figures together to tell Ragnar's story as a dramatic storytelling device
- Brownworth reveals that the hardest part of writing about Vikings was developing an organizational scheme due to lack of comprehensive historical information
- Brownworth suggests that Roman military ideals and concepts of honor in battle may have traveled north to influence Scandinavian warrior culture
- Brownworth notes that even the name 'Scandinavia' comes from Roman authors who mistakenly thought it was an island with one tribe called the Scandia
Topics
Transcript
[0:03] As a small aside, since Ragnar is the star of the Vikings TV series, I don't know if you've gotten a chance to watch any of it. Is there any accuracy to it? I think it's well done. My one quibble Ragnar's brother is Rollo in the show, right? Yeah. They weren't brothers. In fact, by some accounts, they were born 80 years apart. Um but as a storytelling device, I [0:33] applaud that. Yeah, they basically take all the main Vikings and put them all together and just tell the story of Ragnar. >> Honestly, in writing a book about it, the hardest part was coming up with an organizational scheme. Like, what's what's the overarching thing that…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Lex Clips
How the Civil War ended | Gary Gallagher and Lex Fridman
Gary Gallagher and Lex Fridman discuss how the Civil War ended, focusing on Lee's surrender at Appomattox and Grant's magnanimous treatment of Confederate forces. They explore how Grant's generous surrender terms, influenced by Lincoln's reconciliation goals, contrasted with calls from Radical Republicans for harsher punishment and how this approach facilitated national reunification rather than perpetuating resentment.
White supremacy after the Civil War | Gary Gallagher and Lex Fridman
Historian Gary Gallagher discusses Reconstruction, white supremacy, and Confederate memory in post-Civil War America, emphasizing that Northern troops were insufficient to enforce equal rights for freed Black people, and explaining how the "Lost Cause" narrative allowed the South to reframe the war's purpose while Jim Crow became the mechanism for maintaining white supremacy.
The truth about the Civil War - Why people volunteered to fight | Gary Gallagher and Lex Fridman
Historian Gary Gallagher discusses the distinction between causation and motivation in Civil War volunteerism, explaining that while slavery caused the war, most Northern soldiers were motivated by belief in preserving the Union as a democratic republic. He emphasizes that understanding citizen-soldiers' sense of civic duty and American exceptionalism is essential to comprehending why ordinary people risked their lives for the Union.
Christianity and religion during the Civil War | Gary Gallagher and Lex Fridman
Both Union and Confederate sides during the American Civil War were overwhelmingly Protestant Christian and used religious justification for their military efforts. Interestingly, Confederate leaders like Lee and Jackson were notably more overtly religious in their official communications than Union commanders like Grant and Sherman.
Racism in America after slavery was abolished | Gary Gallagher and Lex Fridman
Gary Gallagher discusses how abolishing slavery was only the beginning of achieving equal rights for Black Americans, noting that most Northern whites prioritized saving the Union over ensuring racial equality. He explains that legal changes like the Civil Rights Act took over a century to achieve, while the deeper work of changing societal attitudes and prejudices remains ongoing and vulnerable to exploitation.