The value of hard work - Advice for young people | Don Lincoln and Lex Fridman
Physicist Don Lincoln shares his journey from a poor rural background to becoming a particle physicist at Fermilab, discussing the role of science fiction, popular science communicators, and insatiable curiosity in shaping his career. He reflects on the extreme work ethic he maintained as a graduate student and argues that genuine passion and grit are what separate truly great scientists from merely smart ones. He also expresses motivation to reach underserved young people through science communication.
Summary
Don Lincoln opens by describing his humble origins — growing up poor in a rural area with supportive but academically limited parents. His mother could only help him with math through sixth or seventh grade, yet his environment was nurturing. Two major intellectual influences shaped his early path: a voracious appetite for science fiction (reading a book a day as a child), which fostered imagination, and popular science communicators of the 1970s such as Isaac Asimov, Carl Sagan, and George Gamow, who wrote accessible science books for lay audiences. These influences, combined with an irrepressible curiosity about deep philosophical and cosmological questions — such as the origin, nature, and fate of the universe — drove him toward science.
In college, Lincoln pursued minors in philosophy and religion hoping those disciplines might answer his deepest questions, but ultimately concluded that science was the better path. He then faced a fork between cosmology/astrophysics and particle physics. In the mid-1980s, cosmology had relatively few empirical measurements, while particle physics offered the ability to run actual experiments and get concrete answers. That empirical rigor drew him to particle physics.
Lincoln then discusses his legendary work ethic as a graduate student at Fermilab. Without family obligations, he voluntarily worked Monday through Saturday from 8:00 a.m. to midnight, and Sundays from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., using the remaining Sunday hours for chores. He emphasizes that this was driven entirely by passion — he simply couldn't imagine doing anything else. He argues that while intelligence is necessary, the traits that truly distinguish great scientists are drive and grit. For him, a failing experiment didn't produce discouragement but rather anger and renewed determination to solve the problem.
Finally, Lincoln reflects on why he invests heavily in science communication — writing books and making videos. He grew up without access to the mentors and resources that children of educated families often have, and he wants to reach other kids in small towns across America who are in the same position he once was. He notes that he has already seen the tangible impact of this work, with summer interns at Fermilab telling him they were inspired by his content. He closes by suggesting that one of those young viewers might be the person who answers the big unanswered questions in physics.
Key Insights
- Lincoln credits 1970s popular science communicators — Isaac Asimov, Carl Sagan, and George Gamow — as critical influences, arguing that accessible lay-science writing gave him a foothold into science that textbooks never could have provided as a child.
- Lincoln chose particle physics over cosmology in the mid-1980s specifically because cosmology at the time had too much theorizing and too few measurements, whereas particle physics offered the ability to actually run experiments and get definitive answers.
- As a graduate student, Lincoln voluntarily worked 8:00 a.m. to midnight Monday through Saturday and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Sundays — not out of obligation but because he couldn't imagine wanting to do anything else.
- Lincoln argues that what separates truly great scientists from merely smart ones is not intelligence but grit — specifically, the tendency to respond to a failed experiment with anger and increased effort rather than discouragement and withdrawal.
- Lincoln's motivation for science communication is rooted in his own background: he believes there are kids in rural, under-resourced areas who lack access to mentors, and he wants his books and videos to serve as the kind of guide he never had — a mission confirmed when Fermilab interns have told him his content inspired them.
Topics
Transcript
[0:03] You have a really inspiring life story. Your folks didn't uh go to college. Can you just tell me about your childhood and where you found the love for physics and science and maybe how you found your journey to to to become a physicist given the the context of where you came from? Well, uh, [sighs and gasps] you know, I grew up a poor kid in the boondocks. Great parents, but not ones that could guide me terribly [0:33] academically, but very, uh, very nurturing. You know, my mom would laugh that she could stop helping me math after like sixth or seventh grade, you know. Um, but they were supportive. And there were a couple of…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Lex Clips
Sex in the Roman Empire | Anthony Kaldellis and Lex Fridman
Anthony Kaldellis discusses Justinian I's reign, focusing on his meritocratic appointment of talented individuals regardless of social class (including his wife Theodora, a former sex worker), his monumental codification of Roman law through the Corpus Juris Civilis, and the paradox of his harsh stance on sexuality despite his own unconventional personal choices.
Did the plague kill half the Roman Empire? | Anthony Kaldellis and Lex Fridman
Anthony Kaldellis discusses the Plague of Justinian (541 AD), arguing against the maximalist claim that it killed 50% of the Roman population. He contends that modern pathogen identification combined with historical evidence shows the plague had far less impact than commonly assumed, as evidenced by Justinian's continued military campaigns and taxation during the outbreak.
Persian Empire vs Roman Empire: The war that destroyed both empires | Anthony Kaldellis
Anthony Kaldellis discusses the Byzantine-Persian War (602-628 CE) and its catastrophic consequences for both empires, explaining how Heraclius's civil war weakened Roman defenses, the eventual Arab conquests stripped away the empire's richest provinces, and the subsequent Byzantine survival through military innovation like Greek fire and strategic defensive reorganization.
Why the Roman Empire collapsed in the East | Anthony Kaldellis and Lex Fridman
Anthony Kaldellis discusses how the Eastern Roman Empire, despite territorial losses, maintained remarkable internal stability and could have lasted another thousand years without external invasions. He attributes this resilience to two factors: authorities convincingly persuading subjects they ruled on their behalf, and a unified Roman and Orthodox identity that made the alternatives to imperial rule seem worse.
Lessons from the Roman Empire for modern-day - historian explains | Anthony Kaldellis
Historian Anthony Kaldellis discusses lessons from the 2,200-year Roman Empire for modern America, focusing on the importance of building lasting institutions that serve the majority, aligning foreign policy rhetoric with actual military actions, and the persistent elements of human nature across centuries.