The start of the Viking Age: Why the Vikings began terrorizing Europe | Lars Brownworth
Lars Brownworth explains that the Viking Age began due to overpopulation in Scandinavia and technological advances like the keel, targeting Charlemagne's wealthy but weakly defended empire. Early Viking raids were reconnaissance missions that evolved into large-scale invasions, with rulers like England's Ethelred the Unready making the mistake of paying tribute that only encouraged more attacks.
Summary
The Viking Age emerged from two primary factors according to Brownworth: overpopulation in Scandinavia where 'the fertility of Viking women outstripped the fertility of Viking land,' and technological breakthroughs including the development of the keel for ships. The timing coincided with Charlemagne's consolidation of a vast empire resembling the Western Roman Empire, crowned in 800 AD, which created a wealthy but poorly defended target. Charlemagne's empire was sprawling with terrible communication, making it 'wealthy and weak' - attracting Viking predators. The Frankish expansion north, particularly the crushing of the Saxons, may have removed a buffer zone and put pressure on Danish areas, contributing to early Viking eruptions. Initial Viking raids were largely reconnaissance missions to test defenses and assess wealth. Successful raids like Ragnar Lothbrok's sacking of Paris in 845 became templates that provoked waves of copycat attacks throughout the 860s. The Vikings strategically switched targets between France and England as each became exhausted or conquered. European rulers' responses often backfired spectacularly, as demonstrated by Ethelred the Unready of England, who paid 7.5 million silver pennies in a single year - equivalent to 48,000 pounds of silver - to make Vikings go away. This appeasement strategy only attracted more raiders, and throughout his reign, Ethelred paid approximately 20 tons of gold and silver in tribute, demonstrating how paying Viking raiders was like paying muggers - it only brought more of them.
Key Insights
- Brownworth argues there were two main causes for the Viking Age: overpopulation where 'the fertility of Viking women outstripped the fertility of Viking land' and technological breakthroughs with the keel
- Brownworth describes Charlemagne's empire as 'wealthy and weak' because it was sprawling with terrible communication, making it an attractive target for Viking predators
- Brownworth suggests that Charlemagne's expansion north and crushing of the Saxons may have removed a buffer zone and put pressure on Danish areas, contributing to Viking eruptions
- Brownworth explains that many early Viking raids were 'probing raids' to test defenses, with successful ones like Ragnar Lothbrok's sacking of Paris in 845 becoming templates for waves of copycat attacks
- Brownworth argues that paying Vikings tribute was counterproductive, comparing Ethelred the Unready's payments to 'someone's mugging you so you pay them more money so they'll go away' - it only brought more raiders
Topics
Transcript
[0:02] So there's two main theories about why the Viking Age starts. The first Will Durant puts it I think the best. He says the fertility of the Viking women outstripped the fertility of the Viking land. Basically overpopulation. Um and then they're they're searching for food. And then the second is there's this technological breakthrough with the keel and maybe pressure put on Charlemagne's consolidation and and a little worries like that. I don't see why both can't be true. Um but I do [0:33] I do also think Europe like Charlemagne puts together this vast empire that you know, fairly approximates the Western Roman Empire. If you squint, it looks like the Western Roman Empire. He's calling himself…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Lex Clips
Sex in the Roman Empire | Anthony Kaldellis and Lex Fridman
Anthony Kaldellis discusses Justinian I's reign, focusing on his meritocratic appointment of talented individuals regardless of social class (including his wife Theodora, a former sex worker), his monumental codification of Roman law through the Corpus Juris Civilis, and the paradox of his harsh stance on sexuality despite his own unconventional personal choices.
Did the plague kill half the Roman Empire? | Anthony Kaldellis and Lex Fridman
Anthony Kaldellis discusses the Plague of Justinian (541 AD), arguing against the maximalist claim that it killed 50% of the Roman population. He contends that modern pathogen identification combined with historical evidence shows the plague had far less impact than commonly assumed, as evidenced by Justinian's continued military campaigns and taxation during the outbreak.
Persian Empire vs Roman Empire: The war that destroyed both empires | Anthony Kaldellis
Anthony Kaldellis discusses the Byzantine-Persian War (602-628 CE) and its catastrophic consequences for both empires, explaining how Heraclius's civil war weakened Roman defenses, the eventual Arab conquests stripped away the empire's richest provinces, and the subsequent Byzantine survival through military innovation like Greek fire and strategic defensive reorganization.
Why the Roman Empire collapsed in the East | Anthony Kaldellis and Lex Fridman
Anthony Kaldellis discusses how the Eastern Roman Empire, despite territorial losses, maintained remarkable internal stability and could have lasted another thousand years without external invasions. He attributes this resilience to two factors: authorities convincingly persuading subjects they ruled on their behalf, and a unified Roman and Orthodox identity that made the alternatives to imperial rule seem worse.
Lessons from the Roman Empire for modern-day - historian explains | Anthony Kaldellis
Historian Anthony Kaldellis discusses lessons from the 2,200-year Roman Empire for modern America, focusing on the importance of building lasting institutions that serve the majority, aligning foreign policy rhetoric with actual military actions, and the persistent elements of human nature across centuries.