The Long Leash: Why Great SEs Drown After Promotion [75]
Promoting high-performing solution engineers to management roles without structured onboarding and coaching creates hidden risks, as confident new managers mask their gaps and struggle silently. The episode outlines a practical framework including 90-day phase plans with named milestones, explicit commercial training, and mentorship from status-indifferent advisors to prevent newly promoted managers from becoming overwhelmed and ineffective.
Summary
The episode opens with a personal anecdote from one of the hosts about struggling six weeks into his first leadership role, particularly with understanding his compensation plan's variable components tied to Profit Delta. Despite receiving a title and broader responsibility, he received no structured guidance or coaching on how to navigate the role.
The core problem identified is that newly promoted solution engineers, especially high performers, naturally mask their insecurity and confusion because they fear appearing weak in front of their new teams and peers. This creates a false feedback loop where leaders assume everything is fine when in fact significant gaps exist. The confidence that made them excellent individual contributors now works against them—they can hide problems for months.
The discussion reveals that new managers often don't voluntarily admit confusion because they view it as "handing people ammunition" in a politically vulnerable period. This means leaders cannot rely on new managers self-reporting their struggles; instead, they must assume gaps exist rather than waiting to be told.
The episode proposes several solutions: First, require new managers to draft their own 90-day phase plan with named milestones in collaboration with their director. This makes gaps visible on page one rather than hiding them. Second, establish explicit training on the commercial model—walking new managers through their numbers, comp plans, and margin math. Third, pair new managers with mentors who have "nothing left to prove" (status-indifferent advisors), as pairing with high performers one level up creates quiet competition and sabotage. Fourth, use a standing 90-minute director-led session on commercial understanding that can scale across multiple regions and save a year of individual struggles.
The conversation also addresses the screening process before promotion, noting that while status motivation alone doesn't disqualify candidates, asking them to describe hour-by-hour what a week in the new job looks like reveals whether they're thinking about meetings and access (status chasers) or about other people's problems (genuine leadership readiness).
A key turning point in the host's own leadership was working with a low-stakes mentor—an investor's operating partner with no career riding on his growth—for nearly two years, suggesting that the psychological safety provided by mentors with no competitive stake is critical.
About this episode
Ava tells the story of her own first leadership job: the title, the bigger number, and a comp plan she couldn't read. She and Nate work out what a real promotion ramp looks like -- and why the new leader's silence is the least reliable signal you have.
Key Insights
- Confident new managers naturally hide confusion and struggle for months because they fear appearing weak or attackable during a vulnerable period when everyone is watching—making it impossible for leaders to rely on self-reporting of gaps.
- The host argues that pairing new managers with high performers one rung up creates quiet competition and sabotage, whereas mentors with 'nothing left to prove' (status-indifferent advisors) provide the psychological safety necessary for genuine growth.
- The host claims that requiring new managers to draft their own 90-day phase plan with named milestones, rather than handing them a checklist, forces gaps to surface on page one because people naturally underestimate what they don't know.
Topics
Transcript
Hey there and welcome to Leading Pre-Sales, the show for solution engineering leaders who want to build teams that drive revenue and not just demos. My name is Tim and I'm the co-founder of SE Rockstars and together with Jan, we've coached over 350 solution engineers and their leaders across several dozens of companies. Every conversation you hear on this show is based on real coaching situations, real challenges, real problems that as e-leaders like you are dealing with right now. None of this is made up. We use AI to bring these stories to life through our two hosts, Nate and Ava, but the insights come straight from the trenches. Each episode gives you one actionable takeaway you can…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Leading PreSales | The Solution Engineering Leadership Show
Your Best SE Won't Leave Over Money — They'll Leave Over the Ceiling [74]
Top SEs leave due to unmet career ambitions and unclear ceilings, not primarily over compensation. Leaders must have honest conversations twice yearly about what employees are optimizing for and whether that opportunity genuinely exists in the organization within 18 months.
The Training That Made Me Quit [73]
A solution engineering leader describes how excellent enablement training on value-based selling fundamentally changed his approach, but ultimately led him to quit when the organization's operating systems remained misaligned with what he'd learned. The episode explores the critical gap between training people and restructuring the systems they work within.
Hire the Second Version, Not the First [72]
The episode discusses redesigning SE hiring to evaluate coachability rather than polish by introducing a two-stage interview process: an initial coaching session with one manager, followed by a panel evaluation one week later, scoring the gap between versions rather than absolute performance.
Retire The Technical Win Trophy [71]
The episode critiques celebrating technical wins too early in the sales cycle, arguing that a technical checkpoint means nothing if the deal ultimately fails. The hosts propose redefining technical wins as validation that you're still in contention (one of 2-3 vendors) and establishing specific post-POC activities rather than retiring the metric entirely.
Never Lie, Never Answer Reflexively [70]
Solution engineers often answer questions reflexively without understanding their context, which can damage deals even when the answer is technically honest. The key principle is distinguishing between genuine honesty and unfiltered explaining, and training SEs to ask clarifying questions before responding.