Jocko Underground: When To Walk Away From Your Significant Other. And Don't Look Back.

The episode opens with a listener question from a woman who left her boyfriend after discovering a loaded gun under his pillow pointed at her side of the bed. Her ex had been using Kratom and was experiencing severe mental health deterioration, including insomnia, hallucinations involving demons, and delusional beliefs. Despite her attempts to reposition or secure the firearm, he kept returning it to the same position. She ultimately left, informed his brother and pastor, and cut off contact — but has since been questioning whether she made the right call and whether she should have done more.

Jocko's response is unambiguous: this is a textbook 'walk away and don't look back' situation. He rejects any notion that the protocol changes when mental health or addiction is involved. He argues that continuing contact would enable the ex's behavior, create false hope, increase her personal risk, and reinforce a codependent dynamic — making the situation worse for both parties.

On the question of 'taking ownership,' Jocko reframes what ownership actually means in this context. He contends she has already fulfilled her obligation by recommending professional help and notifying people close to him. He uses the analogy of jumping into water to save a drowning person and drowning yourself — arguing that self-sacrifice does not constitute help. True ownership, he argues, means recognizing the limits of what you can do and not destroying your own life in the process.

For anyone who feels compelled to check on the ex out of genuine concern, Jocko reluctantly suggests using multiple degrees of separation — such as calling someone who can contact authorities — so that the woman's identity never reaches the ex. Even this, he notes, he would not recommend.

The conversation briefly shifts to a discussion of Kratom itself. Neither Jocko nor Echo Charles knows much about it, but they note it has a stimulant reputation, is associated with severe physiological addiction and withdrawal symptoms, and had a period of legal gray-area status before being regulated. They also acknowledge that pre-existing mental health conditions may have amplified the ex's reaction to the substance.