537: We See What's Happening But Miss What's Going On.
Jocko Willink and Echo Charles explore why humans consistently mistake surface-level events for deeper underlying dynamics, arguing that emotional reactions, cognitive biases, and media manipulation prevent accurate assessment of complex situations. Drawing from combat experience, jiu-jitsu, and geopolitical analysis, Jocko advocates for detachment, epistemic humility, and iterative decision-making over confident proclamations about what is 'going on.'
Summary
The episode opens with Jocko framing a deceptively simple question: 'What is going on?' He argues that even in our most personal domains — family, work, daily life — we routinely misread situations despite having direct access to them. Emotions, biases, ego, fear, past experiences, group loyalty, and fatigue all distort the lens through which we perceive reality. Jocko notes that watching others make obvious mistakes is easy, yet we commit the same errors constantly without recognizing it.
Jocko then scales this problem outward to world events, particularly ongoing wars. He acknowledges that war is genuinely horrifying — involving death, mutilation, and civilian casualties — and that being emotionally unmoved would be abnormal. However, he warns against becoming so emotionally consumed by distant events that it impairs personal functioning or distorts judgment. He draws on his combat leadership experience to argue that emotions like anger, fear, and shock don't improve decision-making; they color the lens too dramatically.
A central argument is that nobody — not intelligence analysts, not stock market quants, not geopolitical experts — truly knows what is going on. He cites the U.S. Marine Corps Warfighting Manual, which states that the very nature of war makes certainty impossible, and quotes Clausewitz on war being a fundamentally human and uncertain endeavor. Jocko extends this to all of life: the same fog of war exists in business, family dynamics, and interpersonal relationships.
Jocko introduces the concept of 'forces at play' as a more useful analytical frame than focusing on facts or history alone. Using a simple family dinner decision as an example, he illustrates how even a trivial choice involves infinite compounding forces: past resentments, power dynamics, financial constraints, emotional states, loyalty, identity, and more. He then scales this to geopolitical situations, listing forces such as tradition, precedent, money, self-interest, ego, revenge, leverage, fatigue, resources, alignment, history, debt, resentment, identity, status, narrative, grievances, culture, and trust. He argues that many of these forces are unseen or unfelt even by the people they are acting upon.
A key distinction Jocko draws is between 'what's happening' and 'what's going on.' What's happening refers to observable surface events; what's going on refers to the deeper, often invisible dynamics driving those events. He illustrates this with a jiu-jitsu analogy: when controlling a larger opponent, hanging on tightly to one limb causes you to get swept, because you're tracking small movements while missing the large positional shift. The same applies to geopolitical analysis, business, parenting, and relationships — hyper-focusing on small details causes you to miss broad directional changes.
Jocko then critiques the 24-hour news cycle, comparing it to someone analyzing a single punch in a 500-punch MMA fight and declaring the winner. He argues that every hour, media presents minor tactical developments as culminating strategic moments, which is epistemically misleading and emotionally manipulative. He notes that governments, media organizations, religious groups, advertisers, and political actors all actively exploit this tendency through disinformation, propaganda, selective reporting, exaggeration, and oversimplification.
His prescriptions include: admitting uncertainty as a starting point; gathering data through observation before judgment; detaching from emotional and tactical fixation; using time and distance as filters before making assessments; avoiding over-indexing on any single data point; and using an iterative decision-making process — making the smallest possible decision, observing feedback, and adjusting. He also notes that the first report is always wrong and that subsequent reports should be correlated as a whole over time rather than treated as individual gospel.
The conversation with Echo Charles extends into morale as an underappreciated force, illustrated through Napoleon's ratio of morale to numbers, personal Pop Warner football memories, and jiu-jitsu matches where momentum visibly shifted based on psychological state. Echo also shares Jason Khalipa's insight about jiu-jitsu functioning as a stress-patch clearer, resetting accumulated emotional residue from unresolved daily conflicts. The episode closes with product endorsements for Jocko Fuel, Origin USA, and Jocko Store, and acknowledgment of military personnel, first responders, and veterans.
Key Insights
- Jocko argues that even with direct personal experience of a situation, people regularly misinterpret what is happening because emotions, biases, ego, fear, and past experience all distort perception — making bad decisions feel justified.
- Jocko claims that nobody — including the most sophisticated analysts with AI, algorithms, and historical data — can accurately predict complex outcomes, citing stock market quants and the 2008 housing crash as evidence that expert consensus frequently fails.
- Jocko distinguishes between 'what's happening' (observable surface events) and 'what's going on' (the underlying forces driving those events), arguing that most people, including media consumers, confuse the two and mistake tactical details for strategic understanding.
- Jocko argues that the 24-hour news cycle is structurally designed to present minor tactical events as decisive strategic moments, comparing it to stopping an MMA fight after the first punch to declare a winner — a framing he considers both misleading and emotionally manipulative.
- Jocko contends that governments, media organizations, political groups, advertisers, and religious actors all actively and intentionally use disinformation, propaganda, selective reporting, and exaggeration to shape public perception of what is going on.
- Jocko identifies a long list of forces — including tradition, precedent, power, money, self-interest, ego, revenge, leverage, fatigue, resources, identity, status, narrative, grievances, culture, debt, and resentment — as the actual drivers of geopolitical and personal situations, arguing that most analysis ignores the majority of these forces.
- Jocko uses a jiu-jitsu analogy to argue that clinging tightly to one positional detail causes you to miss large-scale positional shifts — and applies this directly to how hyper-focusing on small news events causes people to miss the broader trajectory of world events, family dynamics, and business trends.
- Jocko argues that the instinctive human response to new information is to amplify it — to make a small thing bigger — and that the media reinforces this tendency, resulting in people experiencing daily catastrophizing that rarely corresponds to actual outcomes.
- Jocko claims that time and distance are underutilized cognitive tools: allowing time to pass and creating psychological distance before forming judgments produces more accurate assessments than reacting immediately to breaking developments.
- Jocko argues that morale is a legitimate and powerful strategic force, citing Napoleon's formulation that morale outweighs numbers in military outcomes, and illustrating through sports and jiu-jitsu examples how psychological momentum visibly shifts the actual performance and outcomes of competitors.
- Jocko claims that the first report in any fast-moving situation is always wrong — not due to dishonesty, but because early reporters have only a partial perspective — and that multiple reports must be correlated over time rather than treated as individual authoritative accounts.
- Jocko argues that people tend to lock onto one or two variables they believe they understand and then extrapolate that limited understanding into a confident assessment of an entire complex system — a cognitive error he describes as missing the forest for the trees.
Topics
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to Access