Stop Losing Your Best Ideas: How to Take Notes You'll Actually Use
Most people's notes are never reviewed or used because they're scattered across disconnected tools and folders. The solution is a personal knowledge management framework that categorizes information into four types (PKM, BKM, PPM, BPM) and links every note directly to projects, goals, or tasks for automatic retrieval and actionable value.
Summary
The speaker identifies a critical problem: while people take notes frequently, 80% of those notes are never reviewed again, creating an illusion of productivity without actual value. The traditional approach of capturing ideas in whatever app is convenient and saving them in isolated folders leads to lost insights and inaccessible information. When needed weeks later, these scattered notes become impossible to find despite existing somewhere in digital storage.
The core issue is that notes exist in isolation from the work they're meant to support. The solution is a framework called 'Capturing Beast' built on four categories of information: PKM (personal knowledge management for personal insights), BKM (business knowledge management for team information), PPM (personal project management for personal tasks), and BPM (business project management for team tasks). When capturing any note, the user should ask two questions: Is this personal or team? Is this information or action?
The framework comprises four key practices: First, understand the four information types and categorize accordingly. Second, use a fast intermediate capture tool (phone notes, voice memos) but process these captures daily into a single source of truth. Third, link every note to a specific project, goal, or task—never save standalone floating notes. This creates automatic context so relevant notes appear when working on related projects months later. Fourth, capture only actionable insights that change decision-making or thinking, not exhaustive documentation.
The speaker claims this system transforms knowledge management from scattered collection to compounded knowledge, where each insight builds on previous ones and remains accessible within the context of actual work.
Key Insights
- 80% of notes taken are never reviewed again, meaning most note-taking creates an illusion of productivity while providing zero actual value
- When notes are linked directly to work projects and goals, retrieval becomes automatic rather than requiring users to search through folders and apps
- The speaker's implementation of this framework at both their own organization and the Paperless Movement resulted in members stopping idea loss and starting knowledge compounding
- Asking two questions when capturing notes—'Is this personal or team?' and 'Is this information or action?'—eliminates paralysis about where to save information
- The rule for what to capture is that if information doesn't change what someone does or how they think, it shouldn't be saved, as the goal is building an actionable knowledge base rather than a library
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] I used to have brilliant insights while working on projects, then forget them 20 minutes later. Or I'd save random notes everywhere and never find them again when I actually needed them. And here's what's crazy. I wasn't lazy about taking notes. I was taking the wrong notes in the wrong places. By the end of this video, I'll show you the exact note takingaking framework we use at the Papless Movement and thousands of other professionals worldwide. How to capture only what matters, where to save it, so you'll actually find it, and how to turn [0:30] notes into actions instead of digital clutter. If you take notes, but never use them, this changes everything. So, here's what…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from ICOR with Tom | AI Productivity
I Can Build a $11 Billion Productivity App with AI (You Can Too)
The speaker demonstrates how modern AI models (Claude Sonnet 3.5) enable anyone to build sophisticated productivity applications without extensive coding knowledge, using the newly rebuilt myICOR membership platform as proof. He argues that pre-built platforms like Notion, Circle, and Mighty Networks are becoming obsolete as AI democratizes custom application development, and announces a live workshop teaching the conceptual and technical skills needed to build such apps.
I gave Claude 4 years of our work. It built this app.
A developer used Claude Sonnet 5.5 to build a fully functional ICOR-based productivity application in just one hour by providing the AI with four years of accumulated productivity knowledge and content. The resulting app successfully implements complex ICOR methodology concepts including inbox management, task prioritization, interruption handling, and life dimension tracking, though it needs UI/design refinement.
Claude just replaced every productivity app I use.
A content creator demonstrates how Claude's Sonnet 3.5 model with Code Interpreter can replace multiple productivity apps by building three fully-functional applications in under an hour with minimal prompting. The creator showcases a note-taking app with database features, a Mac application integrating their custom Obsidian plugins and ICOR life management methodology, and highlights the unprecedented speed and polish achievable without traditional development skills.
My AI team took 8 hours. Claude Sonnet 5.5 took 15 minutes.
A creator comparing an 8-hour AI team project with a 15-minute Claude Sonnet 5.5 solution reveals that excessive guardrails and restrictions paradoxically hindered the multi-agent system's performance. The speaker demonstrates how reducing constraints and context allows AI to produce more creative and functional results, though both approaches have significant limitations for production use.
Your knowledge should outlive every AI tool you use.
The speaker clarifies the distinction between the ICOR methodology (a tool-agnostic productivity framework) and its implementations like the ICOR for Life scaffold and myPKA AI team, emphasizing that users can adopt the core principles in any tool they prefer. They announce plans to restructure their membership platform by separating these components to reduce confusion and help users understand they're not locked into specific tools or systems.