The most important job of leadership in the AI era is giving permission and taking accountability
A leader at Intercom explains how leadership in the AI era requires giving employees permission to experiment with AI tools while taking accountability for potential failures. They emphasize that all work will eventually become agent-first and leaders must break down barriers to AI adoption.
Summary
The speaker, who works at Intercom, discusses their leadership approach in implementing AI within their organization. They emphasize that one of their primary roles is providing explicit permission for employees to experiment with AI tools and taking personal accountability by telling staff to 'blame me if it all goes wrong.' The leader expresses strong conviction that AI will fundamentally transform work processes, stating that all work will become 'agent first' in the near future. They acknowledge that organizations face natural apprehension and initial challenges when introducing AI agents into business processes. The speaker argues that leaders at all levels - whether engineers or managers - must focus on enablement and creating space for employees to deeply explore AI capabilities. They believe this approach allows people to reach breakthrough moments where they realize AI's transformative potential for productivity. The overall message centers on leadership's responsibility to actively remove barriers to AI adoption while providing psychological safety for experimentation.
Key Insights
- The speaker's biggest leadership activity at Intercom involves giving employees explicit permission to experiment with AI and telling them to blame him if things go wrong
- The leader asserts that all work will become agent-first at some stage in the near future
- Organizations universally face apprehension and initial issues when introducing AI agents into business processes
- Leadership responsibility extends to all levels including engineers and managers, focused on enablement rather than control
- The goal is creating space for employees to have breakthrough moments where they realize AI's transformative potential for productivity
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] One of the biggest things I do at Intercom is just telling people they can do things or telling them, "Look, whatever you do, just blame me if it all goes wrong." But ultimately, it's that permission. And if you're out there saying, "I'm not sure if AI is going to have a big role to play in all of our work." I mean, keep on saying that all work is going to be agent first at some stage in the near future. And so, we're going to figure out the path there. And so, we're going to break down every barrier as we come across them. But giving that permission thing, but also the freedom to explore or…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from How I AI
GPT-5.6's video editing via Codex is genuinely one of my favorite new workflows
A product manager describes using GPT-5.6 with Codex to automate video editing for social media clips. By simply dragging a file and providing natural language instructions, the AI generated five polished, fast-paced hype videos from a long conference talk recording, dramatically reducing the time-intensive manual clipping process.
Theoretically Intelligent vs. Practically Effective: Why GPT-5.6 Sol Beats Fable for Product Work
An executive contrasts two AI models (Fable and Soul/GPT-5.6 Sol), arguing that Soul is superior for product work because it prioritizes practical effectiveness over theoretical intelligence. The speaker values the ability to ship products to customers and understand end-user goals over theoretical sophistication.
Build a harness when the same workflow needs the same setup and the same outcomes, every time
Building a harness for repetitive workflows allows you to be more prescriptive about job execution, resulting in greater efficiency, consistency, and better outcomes. Rather than explaining requirements to an AI agent each time, a harness lets you use a simpler interface like pasting a link while the agent already understands the intended task.
GPT 5.6-Sol vs. Claude Fable: Why OpenAI’s new model crushes my benchmark
Claire Vo compares OpenAI's new GPT 5.6 models (Soul, Terra, Luna) against Claude's Fable using her custom "How I AI" benchmark, finding that GPT 5.6 Soul excels at practical product work, prototyping, and natural communication, while Fable is theoretically intelligent but pedantic and difficult to collaborate with.
Context offloading is an underrated AI use case
The speaker highlights context offloading as an underrated AI use case, where AI serves as a safety net for routine cognitive tasks like email management and personal finances. Rather than adding new capabilities, AI reduces anxiety about missing important information or making mistakes by handling monitoring tasks, thereby freeing up mental bandwidth.