ChatGPT Images 2.0 Color Analysis
A user tested ChatGPT's image analysis feature for color analysis, finding it initially categorized them as warm neutral but successfully corrected to dark winter when provided feedback. The AI-generated color palettes and styled images were deemed impressive despite some visual artifacts.
Summary
The speaker experimented with ChatGPT's image analysis capabilities by uploading a personal photo to receive a color analysis. Initially, the AI classified them as having a 'warm neutral' color palette, generating earthy warm colors and creating styled images showing them in those colors. While the speaker noted some visual distortions in the generated images, particularly around facial features and teeth, they found the overall result impressive and comparable to professional color analysis services. The speaker then corrected the AI by specifying they are actually a 'dark winter' color type, explaining that their old highlights may have confused the initial analysis. The corrected analysis produced what the speaker considered accurate results. They emphasized the value of such services, noting people typically pay significant amounts for professional color analysis, and suggested this could make a good Mother's Day gift by analyzing photos and purchasing matching jewelry.
Key Insights
- The speaker found ChatGPT's initial color analysis categorized them as warm neutral with earthy colors, though this was incorrect
- The AI-generated images showed some visual artifacts, with the speaker noting their face looked weird and teeth appeared strange in parts
- The speaker revealed they are actually a dark winter color type, not warm neutral as initially analyzed
- The speaker believes their old highlights confused the AI's initial color analysis
- The speaker stated they would pay significant money for professional color analysis services, indicating the AI provided valuable results
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] So I uploaded a photo and asked GPT image two to make me a color analysis and it gave me warm neutral. My best colors are these earthy warm colors and even put me in those colors down here. Now my face got real weird towards the bottom. My teeth are looking kind of funk over here. But overall, I would say this is pretty impressive. This is something that people spend a lot of time putting together. Now what I would say is I am actually a dark winter. So I might come in here and say no, I'm a [0:32] dark winter. You're just confused by my old highlights. All right, here we go and this this…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from How I AI
GPT-5.6's video editing via Codex is genuinely one of my favorite new workflows
A product manager describes using GPT-5.6 with Codex to automate video editing for social media clips. By simply dragging a file and providing natural language instructions, the AI generated five polished, fast-paced hype videos from a long conference talk recording, dramatically reducing the time-intensive manual clipping process.
Theoretically Intelligent vs. Practically Effective: Why GPT-5.6 Sol Beats Fable for Product Work
An executive contrasts two AI models (Fable and Soul/GPT-5.6 Sol), arguing that Soul is superior for product work because it prioritizes practical effectiveness over theoretical intelligence. The speaker values the ability to ship products to customers and understand end-user goals over theoretical sophistication.
Build a harness when the same workflow needs the same setup and the same outcomes, every time
Building a harness for repetitive workflows allows you to be more prescriptive about job execution, resulting in greater efficiency, consistency, and better outcomes. Rather than explaining requirements to an AI agent each time, a harness lets you use a simpler interface like pasting a link while the agent already understands the intended task.
GPT 5.6-Sol vs. Claude Fable: Why OpenAI’s new model crushes my benchmark
Claire Vo compares OpenAI's new GPT 5.6 models (Soul, Terra, Luna) against Claude's Fable using her custom "How I AI" benchmark, finding that GPT 5.6 Soul excels at practical product work, prototyping, and natural communication, while Fable is theoretically intelligent but pedantic and difficult to collaborate with.
Context offloading is an underrated AI use case
The speaker highlights context offloading as an underrated AI use case, where AI serves as a safety net for routine cognitive tasks like email management and personal finances. Rather than adding new capabilities, AI reduces anxiety about missing important information or making mistakes by handling monitoring tasks, thereby freeing up mental bandwidth.