Why the Inquisition Could Never Catch a Single Printer - Ada Palmer
Ada Palmer explains why the Inquisition could never successfully arrest printers or censor pamphlets. Because printers operated at the cutting edge of information distribution, they always received news faster than authorities could act. This created a structural advantage that made rapid-moving information effectively uncensorable.
Summary
In this short excerpt, historian Ada Palmer draws a parallel between historical censorship and modern information control. She begins by noting that while censorship regimes could effectively shape what appeared in books, they could never keep pace with pamphlets — a dynamic she compares to how governments can pressure major media outlets like CNN but cannot control individual voices on social media networks.
Palmer then explains the specific structural reason the Inquisition repeatedly failed to arrest printers: printers were at the center of the information distribution industry. They employed news writers whose entire job was to move information between cities as fast as humanly possible. As a result, printers were always among the first to receive any breaking news — including news of their own impending arrest. By the time Inquisition agents arrived to detain a printer, the printer had already heard about it and fled.
She then broadens this into a general framework for understanding censorship, identifying four intersecting factors: legality (is censorship permitted by law?), and technology (is censorship physically possible?). Her core argument is that you cannot censor whatever medium moves information the fastest, because that medium will always outpace enforcement efforts. Even if one printer was forced to flee, another would take over the shop, and the information would continue to spread — making pamphlets, in her words, effectively 'uncensorable.'
Key Insights
- Ada Palmer argues that printers could never be caught by the Inquisition because they were embedded in the information industry and therefore always received news of their impending arrest before authorities could arrive.
- Palmer draws a direct analogy between the Inquisition's inability to censor printers and modern governments' inability to control speech on decentralized social media networks, contrasting both with their ability to pressure centralized outlets like CNN.
- Palmer identifies technology — not just law — as a critical and often decisive factor in whether censorship is actually achievable, arguing that legal authority means little if enforcement cannot keep pace with information speed.
- Palmer contends that you structurally cannot censor whichever medium moves information the fastest, because that medium will always outrun enforcement efforts.
- Palmer argues that even when individual printers were forced to flee, the censorship still failed — someone else would take over the shop and the information would continue to circulate, making pamphlets effectively uncensorable.
Topics
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to Access