Why the Inquisition Could Never Catch a Single Printer - Ada Palmer
Ada Palmer explains why the Inquisition could never successfully arrest printers or censor pamphlets. Because printers operated at the cutting edge of information distribution, they always received news faster than authorities could act. This created a structural advantage that made rapid-moving information effectively uncensorable.
Summary
In this short excerpt, historian Ada Palmer draws a parallel between historical censorship and modern information control. She begins by noting that while censorship regimes could effectively shape what appeared in books, they could never keep pace with pamphlets — a dynamic she compares to how governments can pressure major media outlets like CNN but cannot control individual voices on social media networks.
Palmer then explains the specific structural reason the Inquisition repeatedly failed to arrest printers: printers were at the center of the information distribution industry. They employed news writers whose entire job was to move information between cities as fast as humanly possible. As a result, printers were always among the first to receive any breaking news — including news of their own impending arrest. By the time Inquisition agents arrived to detain a printer, the printer had already heard about it and fled.
She then broadens this into a general framework for understanding censorship, identifying four intersecting factors: legality (is censorship permitted by law?), and technology (is censorship physically possible?). Her core argument is that you cannot censor whatever medium moves information the fastest, because that medium will always outpace enforcement efforts. Even if one printer was forced to flee, another would take over the shop, and the information would continue to spread — making pamphlets, in her words, effectively 'uncensorable.'
Key Insights
- Ada Palmer argues that printers could never be caught by the Inquisition because they were embedded in the information industry and therefore always received news of their impending arrest before authorities could arrive.
- Palmer draws a direct analogy between the Inquisition's inability to censor printers and modern governments' inability to control speech on decentralized social media networks, contrasting both with their ability to pressure centralized outlets like CNN.
- Palmer identifies technology — not just law — as a critical and often decisive factor in whether censorship is actually achievable, arguing that legal authority means little if enforcement cannot keep pace with information speed.
- Palmer contends that you structurally cannot censor whichever medium moves information the fastest, because that medium will always outrun enforcement efforts.
- Palmer argues that even when individual printers were forced to flee, the censorship still failed — someone else would take over the shop and the information would continue to circulate, making pamphlets effectively uncensorable.
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] The censorship regime is very effective at shaping what is printed in books, but can never keep up with pamphlets. In the same way that the government can pressure CNN, the government can't pressure random people on a social media network. You're not going to be able to keep up with that speed. One of the funny problems that the Inquisition always had. Printers worked in the information distribution industry. They were the people who paid the news writers whose job it is to move as fast as humanly possible between cities, which meant that news always reached them first. So if a printer was ever convicted by the Inquisition, they would [0:31] find out before the Inquisition could…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Dwarkesh Patel
China's Belt and Road Problem - Sarah Paine
Sarah Paine argues that China's Belt and Road Initiative is strategically flawed, citing the economic and security superiority of maritime shipping over land-based routes and China's vulnerability to naval blockade in wartime due to its geographical position surrounded by shallow seas and islands.
Einstein's happiest thought: General Relativity from scratch – Adam Brown
Adam Brown explains Einstein's general relativity from first principles, starting with the equivalence principle and how gravity curves spacetime. He demonstrates why black holes exist as inevitable consequences of general relativity and discusses how falling into a black hole feels different depending on your reference frame.
The Real Effects of the Six Day War - Sarah Paine
Sarah Paine explains how Egypt's closure of the Suez Canal during the Six Day War had unexpected strategic consequences that reshaped global shipping. The blockade forced the development of much larger cargo ships that could not fit through the canal, fundamentally altering maritime economics in ways that persisted long after the canal reopened.
The Dutch-American who saw America's blind spot clearly - Sarah Paine
Sarah Paine discusses Nicholas Spikeman, a Dutch-American geopolitical thinker who warned in 1943 that control of Eurasia could determine global dominance. Spikeman critiqued American statesmen for consistently miscalculating outcomes and failing to develop effective national security strategies, despite the US occupying an advantageous geographic position.
How Geography Shapes Empire - Sarah Paine
Sarah Paine traces the origins of maritime empires back to Athens, contrasting sea-based empires like Rome with land-based empires like Russia and China. She illustrates how geographical terminology reflects fundamentally different imperial orientations: Mediterranean empires centered on the sea as a connecting medium, while Chinese civilization emphasized land-based central authority.