Why Censorship Always Misses What Actually Matters - Ada Palmer
Ada Palmer, a historian of censorship, explains how censors throughout history consistently misidentify threats, focusing on minor issues while ignoring truly revolutionary ideas. She uses the French Enlightenment as an example, where the Inquisition obsessed over Jansenist religious treatises while largely ignoring Voltaire and the Encyclopedia.
Summary
Ada Palmer presents a historical analysis of how censorship efforts systematically fail to target the most significant threats to established order. Using the French Enlightenment period as her primary example, she illustrates how the Inquisition was far more concerned with Jansenism—a Calvinist-influenced version of Catholicism focused on theological debates about the Trinity—than with genuinely revolutionary works by Voltaire, Rousseau, and materialist atheist philosophers whose ideas were spreading across Europe. Palmer describes a specific incident from Matis's book where authorities raided a clandestine bookshop and were willing to overlook Voltaire's works and the banned Encyclopedia, which would 'revolutionize all thought in Europe,' while aggressively pursuing Jansenist treatises. The absurdity of their priorities is highlighted in an anecdote about a ceremonial book burning where officials marched the Encyclopedia to the fire but, upon encountering Jansenist texts about the Trinity, chose to burn those instead because they preferred to preserve the Encyclopedia. Palmer presents this as a universal pattern in censorship throughout history.
Key Insights
- Palmer argues that censors throughout history are consistently wrong about what they should be worried about censoring from our modern perspective
- Palmer describes how the Inquisition was more worried about Jansenist treatises about the Trinity than about Voltaire and materialist atheist ideas spreading across Europe
- Palmer explains that authorities raiding clandestine bookshops would overlook Voltaire's works and the Encyclopedia while aggressively pursuing Jansenist religious treatises
- Palmer recounts how officials chose to burn Jansenist texts about the Trinity instead of the Encyclopedia during a ceremonial burning because they actually loved the Encyclopedia
- Palmer states this pattern of misidentifying censorship priorities is a universal truth throughout history
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] I study the history of censorship. They're always wrong from our perspective about what they should be worried about censoring. So here we are in the French enlightenment. Voltater and Rouso and the Marquita Assad and Latreul articulations of materialist atheism are flying around Europe. And what is the Inquisition worried about? It's worried about Jansenist treatises about the nature of the Trinity. Jansenism is sort of like a Calvinist version of Catholicism. And they are so much more worried about Jansenism than they are about Voltater. That very uh [0:32] chapter in Matis's book I mentioned where they're raiding the clandestine bookshop and they're like Voltater fine. The band Cyclopedi which is going to revolutionize all thought in…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Dwarkesh Patel
How a Random Lunch Led Physics into the Riemann Hypothesis - Grant Sanderson
The discussion highlights a connection between number theory and random matrix theory through the collaboration of Hugh Montgomery and Freeman Dyson, showcasing the interdisciplinary nature of mathematical research. Their findings on the Riemann Hypothesis and the zeros of the Riemann zeta function hint at a deeper similarity between seemingly unrelated fields.
8 Predictions for the Era of Continual Learning
The speaker outlines eight major predictions for how AI systems with continual learning capabilities will transform the industry, regulatory frameworks, technical alignment approaches, market dynamics, and competitive landscapes. Continual learning—where models improve from real-world deployment experience rather than remaining static after training—fundamentally changes assumptions about AI safety, deployment, and business models.
The Skill Great Teachers Have That LLMs Completely Lack - Grant Sanderson
Grant Sanderson discusses a critical limitation of LLMs compared to great human teachers: the inability to reframe or redirect flawed student thinking while validating the creative reasoning behind it. Great teachers can recognize when students approach problems incorrectly and guide them toward better frameworks without dismissing their underlying logic.
The Real Advantage AI Has Over Human Geniuses - Grant Sanderson
Grant Sanderson discusses how AI systems can overcome cognitive biases by systematically adopting different contexts and approaches, using multiple agents with conflicting objectives. He illustrates this with an IMO problem where the elegant intuitive solution was incorrect, and argues that AI's ability to deliberately introduce entropy and diversity could be a key advantage over human thinking patterns.
Why smarter AI models could drive up compute prices 10x
As AI labs like Anthropic scale revenue 10x year-over-year while compute capacity only grows 3x, compute prices must rise significantly to bridge the gap. The speaker argues that as AI models become more capable, they can monetize the same compute at much higher rates, potentially driving prices up 10-15x, creating winner-take-most dynamics and pricing out current AI applications.