Why Censorship Always Misses What Actually Matters - Ada Palmer
Ada Palmer, a historian of censorship, explains how censors throughout history consistently misidentify threats, focusing on minor issues while ignoring truly revolutionary ideas. She uses the French Enlightenment as an example, where the Inquisition obsessed over Jansenist religious treatises while largely ignoring Voltaire and the Encyclopedia.
Summary
Ada Palmer presents a historical analysis of how censorship efforts systematically fail to target the most significant threats to established order. Using the French Enlightenment period as her primary example, she illustrates how the Inquisition was far more concerned with Jansenism—a Calvinist-influenced version of Catholicism focused on theological debates about the Trinity—than with genuinely revolutionary works by Voltaire, Rousseau, and materialist atheist philosophers whose ideas were spreading across Europe. Palmer describes a specific incident from Matis's book where authorities raided a clandestine bookshop and were willing to overlook Voltaire's works and the banned Encyclopedia, which would 'revolutionize all thought in Europe,' while aggressively pursuing Jansenist treatises. The absurdity of their priorities is highlighted in an anecdote about a ceremonial book burning where officials marched the Encyclopedia to the fire but, upon encountering Jansenist texts about the Trinity, chose to burn those instead because they preferred to preserve the Encyclopedia. Palmer presents this as a universal pattern in censorship throughout history.
Key Insights
- Palmer argues that censors throughout history are consistently wrong about what they should be worried about censoring from our modern perspective
- Palmer describes how the Inquisition was more worried about Jansenist treatises about the Trinity than about Voltaire and materialist atheist ideas spreading across Europe
- Palmer explains that authorities raiding clandestine bookshops would overlook Voltaire's works and the Encyclopedia while aggressively pursuing Jansenist religious treatises
- Palmer recounts how officials chose to burn Jansenist texts about the Trinity instead of the Encyclopedia during a ceremonial burning because they actually loved the Encyclopedia
- Palmer states this pattern of misidentifying censorship priorities is a universal truth throughout history
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] I study the history of censorship. They're always wrong from our perspective about what they should be worried about censoring. So here we are in the French enlightenment. Voltater and Rouso and the Marquita Assad and Latreul articulations of materialist atheism are flying around Europe. And what is the Inquisition worried about? It's worried about Jansenist treatises about the nature of the Trinity. Jansenism is sort of like a Calvinist version of Catholicism. And they are so much more worried about Jansenism than they are about Voltater. That very uh [0:32] chapter in Matis's book I mentioned where they're raiding the clandestine bookshop and they're like Voltater fine. The band Cyclopedi which is going to revolutionize all thought in…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Dwarkesh Patel
The Army Sent to Stop Cortés Joined Him Instead - Si Sheppard
Spanish conquistador Cortés faced a threat from Governor Velázquez of Cuba, who sent Don Narvaez with a larger force to arrest him for exceeding his authority. Rather than being defeated, Cortés defeated Narvaez in battle and persuaded the expeditionary force to join him by promising shared wealth from the empire, turning potential enemies into reinforcements.
How 168 Men Captured the Inca Emperor - Si Sheppard
Francisco Pizarro, with only 168 men, captured the Inca Emperor Atahualpa in 1532 at Cajamarca by using psychological tactics with horses and an ambush strategy. Despite Atahualpa's show of dominance and his large army, Pizarro's surprise attack and capture of the emperor allowed him to control the entire Inca social hierarchy.
The Myth of the Helpless Aztecs and Inca - Si Sheppard
Si Sheppard argues that the Aztecs and Incas were not helpless victims but actively developed countermeasures and adaptive strategies against Spanish conquistadors, including terrain manipulation, weapon improvisation, and tactical learning—though they lacked sufficient time to fully master foreign technologies.
How Conquistadors Conquered the Aztecs - Si Sheppard
Conquistador success against the Aztecs relied primarily on steel weapons, horses, and psychological tactics rather than firearms. Steel armor and swords proved far more effective than indigenous weapons made of wood, stone, and obsidian, while horses—animals unknown to the Aztecs—provided decisive military and logistical advantages.
How did a few hundred Spanish soldiers topple two empires? – Si Sheppard
Military historian Si Sheppard explains how a few hundred Spanish conquistadors were able to conquer the Aztec and Inca Empires within just a few years through a combination of technological advantages (horses, steel weapons), psychological warfare, diplomatic manipulation of existing divisions among indigenous peoples, and the catastrophic impact of disease. The conquests were contingent on individual leadership decisions and geographic factors, but were fundamentally enabled by the conquistadors' ability to exploit internal rifts within empires that appeared monolithic from the outside.