Pamphlets, Newspapers, and the Birth of the Magazine — Ada Palmer
Ada Palmer presents historical examples of early print media, including pamphlets, newspapers, and the first magazine, while also examining the physical materials used in early printing and writing. She traces the evolution from sensationalist pamphlets to The Gentleman's Magazine, which pioneered fact-checking by comparing contradicting newspaper accounts.
Summary
Ada Palmer opens by describing pamphlets as cheap, ephemeral printed media that took only two to four days to produce. These short, hand-stitched publications were sold in bulk around towns and to traveling news writers, covering topics ranging from siege reports to royal wedding fashion. She highlights their often sensationalist nature with an example title involving murder, seduction, and cannibalism, noting that pamphlets ranged from outright nonsense to real news, with most being a combination of both.
Palmer then explains the physical properties of early paper, noting that the characteristic blue-gray color of cheap paper covers came from the material itself — paper made from beaten rags that, when unbleached, took on the average color of human clothing. She then transitions to discussing The Gentleman's Magazine, a publication that arose in response to a key problem with the early newspaper era: newspapers frequently contradicted each other, leaving readers uncertain about the truth. The Gentleman's Magazine addressed this by publishing weekly roundups that compiled what various newspapers said about the same events, analyzed contradictions, and assessed which accounts were accurate. Palmer credits it as the first magazine and the origin of the word 'magazine' in this media context.
The talk concludes with a brief examination of historical writing materials. Palmer notes that papyrus, while cheap, is brittle and better suited to scrolls than folded formats because the folded edge cracks easily. She then shows attendees a 17th-century letter written in indecipherable handwriting on cheap parchment, explaining how one can identify which side of the animal skin was the outside versus the inside. She also presents an example of higher-quality parchment and notes that scribes would write around holes in parchment sheets rather than discard them, reflecting how valuable these materials were.
Key Insights
- Palmer argues that pamphlets were not purely factual or fictional — most were combinations of real news and nonsense, and they circulated widely by being sold to traveling news writers moving between cities.
- Palmer explains that the characteristic blue-gray color of cheap pamphlet covers came directly from the papermaking process: unbleached rags beaten into pulp produced the average color of human clothing.
- Palmer claims that The Gentleman's Magazine was created specifically in response to the problem of newspapers contradicting each other, functioning as a weekly media roundup that analyzed which accounts were accurate — essentially the first fact-checking publication.
- Palmer states that The Gentleman's Magazine invented the word 'magazine' as used in the context of periodical publications.
- Palmer notes that scribes wrote around holes in parchment rather than discarding the sheet, illustrating how valuable writing materials were — and that cheap parchment visibly shows which side was the outside versus inside of the animal skin.
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] This is a pamphlet. Naked pages, short text, handstitched together. It would take two or four days to print a pamphlet like that. It's cheap. It's ephemeral. You print a thousand of them. You sell a bunch around the town. You sell a bunch to news writers who are going to and from other cities. And it might be, you know, a report of a siege. It might be here's what the people were wearing at the royal wedding. My favorite ever t title of a pamphlet was the scandalous tale of a doctor from Padua and how he seduced his maid, [0:30] murdered his wife, murdered the maid, cut out her heart and ate it, and how he…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Dwarkesh Patel
The Army Sent to Stop Cortés Joined Him Instead - Si Sheppard
Spanish conquistador Cortés faced a threat from Governor Velázquez of Cuba, who sent Don Narvaez with a larger force to arrest him for exceeding his authority. Rather than being defeated, Cortés defeated Narvaez in battle and persuaded the expeditionary force to join him by promising shared wealth from the empire, turning potential enemies into reinforcements.
How 168 Men Captured the Inca Emperor - Si Sheppard
Francisco Pizarro, with only 168 men, captured the Inca Emperor Atahualpa in 1532 at Cajamarca by using psychological tactics with horses and an ambush strategy. Despite Atahualpa's show of dominance and his large army, Pizarro's surprise attack and capture of the emperor allowed him to control the entire Inca social hierarchy.
The Myth of the Helpless Aztecs and Inca - Si Sheppard
Si Sheppard argues that the Aztecs and Incas were not helpless victims but actively developed countermeasures and adaptive strategies against Spanish conquistadors, including terrain manipulation, weapon improvisation, and tactical learning—though they lacked sufficient time to fully master foreign technologies.
How Conquistadors Conquered the Aztecs - Si Sheppard
Conquistador success against the Aztecs relied primarily on steel weapons, horses, and psychological tactics rather than firearms. Steel armor and swords proved far more effective than indigenous weapons made of wood, stone, and obsidian, while horses—animals unknown to the Aztecs—provided decisive military and logistical advantages.
How did a few hundred Spanish soldiers topple two empires? – Si Sheppard
Military historian Si Sheppard explains how a few hundred Spanish conquistadors were able to conquer the Aztec and Inca Empires within just a few years through a combination of technological advantages (horses, steel weapons), psychological warfare, diplomatic manipulation of existing divisions among indigenous peoples, and the catastrophic impact of disease. The conquests were contingent on individual leadership decisions and geographic factors, but were fundamentally enabled by the conquistadors' ability to exploit internal rifts within empires that appeared monolithic from the outside.