Life after Death is a Scientific and Logical Belief - Dr Zakir Naik
Dr. Zakir Naik argues that belief in life after death is not blind faith but a logical and scientific belief supported by the Quran. He references Surah Mul (67:2) to assert that life is a test for the hereafter. He further reasons that since the Quran has proven correct in many areas science can verify, the remaining unverified claims like the afterlife are likely also true.
Summary
In this short clip, Dr. Zakir Naik presents his argument that belief in life after death — as stated in the Quran — is not a matter of blind religious faith but rather a logical and scientific position. He opens by asserting that while modern science has not yet advanced to the point of proving or disproving life after death, this absence of proof does not make the belief irrational.
He cites the Quran, specifically Surah Mul (Chapter 67, Verse 2), which states that Allah created both death and life in order to test which of humanity is best in deeds. Dr. Naik emphasizes the Quranic ordering — death is created first, then life — and interprets this to mean that earthly existence is a trial or examination in preparation for the hereafter.
Dr. Naik then introduces a probabilistic logical framework to defend belief in Quranic claims that science has not yet verified. He argues that if approximately 80% of Quranic statements have been proven scientifically correct, and the remaining 20% — including concepts like the afterlife, angels, and jinn — are neither confirmed nor denied by science (i.e., ambiguous), then it is logically sound to conclude that the unverified 20% will eventually also prove correct. He closes by inviting the audience to think logically about the concept of life after death.
Key Insights
- Dr. Naik claims that belief in life after death as stated in the Quran is not blind faith but a logical and scientific belief, even though science has not yet advanced enough to prove it.
- Dr. Naik cites Surah Mul (Chapter 67, Verse 2), arguing that Allah created death before life specifically to test which humans are best in their deeds, framing earthly life as a trial for the hereafter.
- Dr. Naik argues that science has also not proven the existence of jinn or angels, implying that absence of scientific proof is not a valid reason to reject Quranic claims.
- Dr. Naik presents a probabilistic argument: if 80% of Quranic claims have been proven scientifically correct, then the remaining 20% — which is ambiguous and unproven rather than disproven — should logically also be accepted as correct.
- Dr. Naik concludes the segment by proposing to examine the concept of life after death through logical reasoning rather than purely scriptural authority, suggesting the belief can stand on rational grounds.
Topics
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to Access