Being Addicted to Luxuries - Dr Zakir Naik
Dr. Zakir Naik categorizes people who indulge in luxuries into three types based on their financial ability and level of dependence. He argues that addiction to luxury is haram in Islam, while affording luxury without dependence may fall into permissible or discouraged categories.
Summary
In this short clip, Dr. Zakir Naik outlines three categories of people in relation to luxury spending from an Islamic perspective.
The second category he discusses involves people who can afford luxuries but are completely dependent on them — they cannot travel without a Rolls-Royce, cannot go out without a Patek Philippe watch, and must always fly first class. Dr. Naik argues that this level of addiction and dependence on luxury is haram (prohibited), citing Surah Isra (chapter 17, verses 25-26) from the Quran, which states that spendthrifts are 'brothers of the devil.'
The third category covers people who can afford luxuries, fulfill their religious financial obligations such as paying zakat, and enjoy luxury items — but are not addicted to them. They can live without these luxuries if needed. Dr. Naik suggests this category may fall under 'mubah' (optional/permissible) or possibly 'makruh' (discouraged), acknowledging there is a difference of opinion among scholars.
Dr. Naik briefly explains the five categories of actions in Islam: fard (compulsory), mustahabb/sunnah (encouraged), mubah (optional), makruh (discouraged), and haram (prohibited), providing the framework through which he evaluates luxury consumption.
Key Insights
- Dr. Naik argues that being addicted to or dependent on luxuries — such as only traveling in a Rolls-Royce or always wearing a Patek Philippe — is haram regardless of whether one can financially afford them.
- Dr. Naik cites Surah Isra, chapter 17, verses 25-26 of the Quran to support his claim that spendthrifts are described as 'brothers of the devil,' using this as the Quranic basis for prohibiting luxury addiction.
- Dr. Naik distinguishes between addiction to luxury and a mere preference for luxury — arguing that someone who likes luxury but is not dependent on it occupies a different and less severe moral category in Islam.
- Dr. Naik notes that paying zakat is a relevant factor in assessing the permissibility of enjoying luxuries, implying that fulfilling religious financial duties changes the moral calculus.
- Dr. Naik explains the five-tier Islamic classification of actions — fard, mustahabb, mubah, makruh, and haram — and places non-addictive luxury enjoyment tentatively in the mubah or makruh category, acknowledging scholarly disagreement.
Topics
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to Access