According to the Upanishads, there is no Image of God - Dr Zakir Naik
Dr. Zakir Naik discusses a verse from the Sitha chapter 4:19 which states that God has no image. He explains that the Sanskrit word 'Pratima' encompasses all forms of visual representation including photographs, paintings, sculptures, and idols.
Summary
Dr. Zakir Naik presents an analysis of a specific verse from the Upanishads, specifically Sitha chapter 4, verse 19, which addresses the concept of God's representation. He emphasizes that this verse explicitly states there is no image of God. Naik provides a detailed linguistic breakdown of the Sanskrit term 'Pratima,' explaining that it encompasses multiple forms of visual representation. He systematically lists what this term includes: images, photographs, paintings, pictures, portraits, sculptures, statues, and idols. By referencing this verse, Naik argues that according to the Upanishads, God cannot and should not be represented through any visual medium or physical form. This interpretation suggests that the Hindu scriptures themselves advocate against idol worship or any form of physical representation of the divine, which aligns with Islamic theological principles that Naik typically promotes in his comparative religious discussions.
Key Insights
- Naik claims that Sitha chapter 4 verse 19 explicitly states that there is no image of God
- Naik explains that the Sanskrit word 'Pratima' encompasses multiple forms of visual representation including images, photographs, paintings, and pictures
- Naik argues that Pratima also includes physical three-dimensional representations such as portraits, sculptures, statues, and idols
- Naik interprets the verse as definitively prohibiting all forms of divine visual representation according to the Upanishads
- Naik presents this Upanishadic teaching as evidence against the practice of creating or worshipping any physical representation of God
Topics
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to Access