NewsTechnical

Why Prediction Markets Are So Hard To Regulate

CNBC

Prediction markets are growing rapidly but face regulatory uncertainty as the CFTC and SEC debate jurisdiction. The key challenge is determining which agency regulates contracts tied to publicly traded companies, with the term "directly affects" remaining ambiguous since the 2010 Dodd-Frank law.

Summary

Prediction markets allow users to bet on real-world events like sports outcomes, inflation levels, or business targets, but their regulation at the federal level remains unclear. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has traditionally regulated these markets as swaps and derivatives based on future events. However, complications arise when prediction market contracts involve publicly traded companies, triggering potential Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) jurisdiction under the Dodd-Frank Act's security-based swap provisions. A security-based swap is defined as any contract whose value is tied to a single company's stock, a loan, or an event that directly affects that company's financial statements or financial condition. The critical ambiguity centers on what "directly affects" means—since 2012, this definition has been an open question. Clear-cut cases like "Will Apple go bankrupt?" fall under SEC jurisdiction, but murkier examples like "Will Apple announce a new phone this year?" or "Will the CEO step down?" create gray areas. These latter questions may appear to be simple event contracts but could function as proxies for trading in company performance, making them derivatives of securities. Currently, both the CFTC and SEC are soliciting public comment on where regulatory lines should be drawn. The CFTC is leading rulemaking efforts and has established itself as the primary regulator for now, though it acknowledges ongoing legal disputes with states over jurisdictional authority. To prevent regulatory conflict, the CFTC and SEC announced a memorandum of understanding in March to coordinate efforts and reduce redundant requirements. The uncertainty surrounding regulation could limit what contracts prediction market platforms like Polymarket and Kshi can list and which rules they must follow. Experts warn that if regulatory clarity is delayed, these platforms may operate overseas, leaving American investors either unable to access them or exposed to unprotected fraud risks.

Key Insights

  • The broad definition of swap in the Commodities Exchange Act allowed yes-or-no event contracts to fall squarely within CFTC jurisdiction, which is why the CFTC became the primary regulator of prediction markets.
  • The term "directly affects" in Dodd-Frank has been an open question since 2012, creating ambiguity about whether contracts like "Will Apple announce a new phone?" or "Will the CEO step down?" constitute securities-based swaps under SEC jurisdiction or simple event contracts under CFTC jurisdiction.
  • Prediction market platforms currently scaled under only one regulator (the CFTC), so unclear definitions about which contracts fall under SEC jurisdiction could add significant bureaucratic burden as these platforms continue to scale.
  • If platforms must comply with both CFTC and SEC requirements simultaneously, they would need to satisfy two different regulatory frameworks with fundamentally different approaches, potentially driving these products and American investors overseas where protections are absent.
  • Regulators are attempting to move quickly to establish clear definitions and standards through joint SEC-CFTC coordination before prediction markets become too large to regulate effectively.

Topics

Prediction markets and event contractsCFTC vs. SEC regulatory jurisdictionSecurity-based swaps and Dodd-Frank ActJurisdictional ambiguity and the definition of "directly affects"Regulatory coordination and memorandum of understandingCompliance challenges for prediction market platformsRisk of offshore migration if regulatory clarity is delayed

Transcript

[0:00] Prediction markets sound simple. You pick yes or no on a real world event. So that could be whether a team wins or whether inflation hits a certain level or if a company reaches a key business target. And if you're right, you get paid. These are known as event contracts. But what's not simple is who should regulate these new markets at the federal level. >> What we're seeing is a new asset class or at least a very quickly growing asset class that has a number of jurisdictional questions. This is really a jump ball. like nobody knows how it's [0:30] going to turn out. >> For years, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission or the CFTC has…

Full transcript available for MurmurCast members

Sign Up to Access

More from CNBC

Get AI summaries like this delivered to your inbox daily

Get AI summaries delivered to your inbox

MurmurCast summarizes your YouTube channels, podcasts, and newsletters into one daily email digest.