How Snack Companies Could Lose Millions Of Dollars Over ‘MAHA’ Laws
New SNAP restrictions inspired by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s MAHA movement are limiting purchases of sugary drinks and candy, with over 20 states implementing these rules affecting nearly one-third of SNAP participants. Food companies face potential losses of $830 million this year as they scramble to understand changing consumer behavior and reformulate products to comply with new regulations.
Summary
Iowa has recently signed a law inspired by the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement, which restricts SNAP recipients from purchasing sugary drinks, soda, and candy while also cracking down on synthetic petroleum-based food dyes in schools. Supporters argue these restrictions ensure taxpayer-funded food assistance is spent on more nutritious options and improve public health. However, major food companies including PepsiCo, Coca-Cola, Kraft Heinz, Hershey, General Mills, and J.M. Smucker face significant financial challenges from these policy changes. Over 20 states have received USDA approval for food restriction waivers, collectively representing nearly one-third of all SNAP participants in America. Numerator estimates these restrictions could reduce food and beverage sales by as much as $830 million in a single year. Companies are actively studying how SNAP shoppers will adjust their purchasing habits, examining product substitutions and budget tradeoffs to predict future buying patterns. While J.M. Smucker's CEO stated that current changes haven't had meaningful impact yet, there remains uncertainty as some states are considering broader definitions that could extend restrictions beyond soda and candy to other packaged snacks. Additionally, Secretary Kennedy's push to eliminate artificial colors has prompted multiple manufacturers to pledge reformulation of products by 2027 or sooner, with Nestle already meeting this accelerated timeline. The fundamental question facing the food industry is how the snack aisle will evolve as regulators change SNAP eligibility requirements and consumer demand for healthier products continues to grow.
Key Insights
- Numerator estimates that SNAP restrictions could reduce food and beverage sales by as much as $830 million this year alone, with the most impacted categories being candy, soda, and snacks sold by major companies like PepsiCo, Coca-Cola, and Hershey.
- Over 20 states have received USDA approval for food restriction waivers, collectively representing nearly one-third of all SNAP participants in America, demonstrating the widespread scale of these policy changes.
- Hershey is studying SNAP shoppers' buying habits to understand product swaps and budget tradeoffs, essentially trying to predict what shoppers will purchase if they can no longer buy restricted products.
- Secretary Kennedy's push to eliminate artificial colors has accelerated industry-wide reformulation efforts, with multiple manufacturers pledging to remove synthetic dyes and additives by 2027 or sooner.
- Some states are considering broader definitions of restricted foods that could eventually extend restrictions beyond soda and candy to include other packaged snacks, creating ongoing uncertainty for food companies.
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] What if I told you that some of America's biggest food companies are set to lose hundreds of millions of dollars? Well, new laws forbidding shoppers from buying certain things with SNAP benefits will soon make that a reality. Let's start in Iowa. The state recently signed a law inspired by MAHA, the Make America Healthy Again movement created by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. >> Iowa is leading by improving nutrition, strengthening public health, and building a stronger future for American children and families. [0:30] >> The law cracks down on synthetic petroleum-based food dyes in schools and restricts SNAP recipients from using benefits to purchase sugary drinks like soda and candy. Now, supporters…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from CNBC
Exclusive look inside SK Hynix's $720 billion AI memory expansion
SK Hynix, the world's leading maker of high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips for AI, is investing $720 billion to triple production capacity by 2034 in response to unprecedented demand from major tech companies. The company is expanding aggressively across South Korea and into the US, but faces the classical risk of the memory industry's boom-and-bust cycles.
Why airfare is unlikely to go down
Airfare prices are unlikely to decrease this summer despite recent drops in fuel costs, as the four largest US airlines control over 82% of US seats and face no customer resistance to higher fares. The collapse of discount competitor Spirit Airlines has removed tens of millions of affordable seats from the market, further reducing pricing pressure.
Why Otis isn't focused on building new elevators
Otis, the world's largest elevator company, invests heavily in testing and maintenance rather than new elevator development. Since spinning off from United Technologies in 2020, Otis has grown sales by 13% and now services 2.5 million elevators annually, though its stock has underperformed the industrial sector recently.
Inside Bracket22, A Trading Firm Powered By Al Agents
A hedge fund manager describes how he replaced his 7-8 person global trading operation with AI agents, reducing annual costs from millions to $30-40K while achieving 10x productivity gains. He demonstrates his AI-powered trading firm 'Bracket22' featuring specialized agents like Houston (mission control), Doocey (red team analysis), and Steffi (technical analysis), arguing that the future of Wall Street involves individual managers paired with 1-2 humans and a swarm of AI agents.
How Much It Will Take To Challenge China’s Battery Dominance
The US government is investing $500 million to reduce dependence on China's dominant battery supply chain, but faces significant challenges in closing the gap. China controls most steps in battery production from raw material refining to finished EVs, with particular dominance in the critical midstream processing stages that the US severely lacks.