NewsInsightful

How AI Is Ruining Job Interviews

CNBC Make It

AI-powered interview tools are increasingly used by employers to screen job candidates due to cost savings and efficiency, but they have significant limitations including poor follow-up capabilities, inability to accommodate pauses for thought, and potential bias issues. Nearly 40% of candidates have withdrawn from hiring processes that included AI interviews, citing frustration with the impersonal and often discriminatory experience.

Summary

AI interview technology is becoming widespread in hiring processes, with nearly two-thirds of job seekers reporting they've been interviewed by AI as of 2026. Employers are adopting these tools for several reasons: cost savings when lacking in-house recruiters, time management amid a historic surge in applications (with job applicants per role doubling since spring 2022), and the reality that recruiting teams have been substantially reduced. AI interview systems typically present an introduction followed by job-relevant questions, record responses, and provide hiring managers with summaries, performance scores, and overall rankings to determine who advances.

However, the technology has notable limitations. AI tools struggle with follow-up questions because language models are coded to predict expected next words rather than intelligently assess responses. The systems frequently interrupt candidates mid-thought, not allowing processing time or opportunities to reformulate answers. This rigid timing pressure creates a poor candidate experience compared to human interviews.

Beyond user experience issues, researchers have documented concerns about bias and discrimination embedded in these systems. Some candidates report being unable to complete video interviews due to disability-related factors like involuntary eye movement, with the AI systems demanding they "look straight ahead" without accommodation. Allegations of discrimination based on age, race, and disability have been filed against certain software providers.

The pushback has been significant: 38% of U.S. candidates surveyed have withdrawn from hiring processes containing AI interviews, and 12% say they would withdraw if one were required. Experts note that AI interviews lack the human elements crucial to productive conversations—reassurance, social cues, and emotional acknowledgment. For candidates proceeding with AI interviews, experts recommend explicit yes/no answers, clear enunciation, and treating the communication differently than person-to-person interviews while maintaining fundamentally the same approach.

Key Insights

  • Nearly two-thirds of job seekers surveyed in 2026 reported being interviewed by AI, representing a 12% increase from six months prior, indicating rapid adoption of automated interview technology.
  • Recruiting teams at many companies have been significantly reduced to sometimes just 1-2 people, making it nearly impossible for them to screen all qualified applicants amid the influx of applications.
  • AI interview tools fail at follow-up questions because language models are coded on expected next words rather than intelligent assessment, sometimes embedding gibberish from candidate responses into follow-up questions.
  • Some candidates with disabilities like nystagmus cannot complete AI video interviews because the systems enforce rigid requirements like "look straight ahead" without accommodation, preventing them from finishing assessments.
  • Nearly 4 in 10 U.S. candidates have withdrawn from hiring processes that included AI interviews, and an additional 12% say they would withdraw if an AI interview were required, despite the current labor market favoring employers.

Topics

AI adoption in hiring and recruitmentEmployer cost-saving and efficiency motivationsTechnical limitations of AI interview systemsBias and discrimination in AI hiring toolsCandidate experience and pushback against automationAccessibility and disability considerationsStrategies for succeeding in AI interviews

Transcript

[0:00] If you've applied for a job recently, there's a growing chance the first person interviewing you isn't a person at all. They just said, okay, well, we would like to do a phone interview and we will be calling you at this time. And so, at first, I'm like talking like I would to a person and then it clicks in that this is not a person. Nearly two-thirds of job seekers surveyed in 2026 said they've already been interviewed by AI, a 12% increase from six months prior. There are several reasons why employers are leaning into AI to conduct more interviews. [0:31] I think some companies probably are using it as a cost-saving measure if they do…

Full transcript available for MurmurCast members

Sign Up to Access

More from CNBC Make It

Get AI summaries like this delivered to your inbox daily

Get AI summaries delivered to your inbox

MurmurCast summarizes your YouTube channels, podcasts, and newsletters into one daily email digest.