Why You’re Obsessed, Anxious, & Still Single - Mercedes Coffman
Therapist Mercedes Coffman discusses how 'avoidant culture' and dating apps are rewiring emotionally available people's nervous systems, creating addiction-like attachment patterns. She explains how modern dating's emphasis on speed, novelty, and instant gratification systematically disadvantages those seeking genuine connection. The conversation covers limerence, self-abandonment, emotional capacity, and practical frameworks for protecting oneself in modern dating.
Summary
Mercedes Coffman, a therapist specializing in emotionally available clients, opens by defining 'avoidant culture' as a systemic preference for anything that avoids discomfort, effort, or consistency — a pattern she argues is deeply reinforced by dating apps designed around dopamine, novelty, and disposability. She contends that emotionally unavailable people thrive on these platforms because they seek dopamine hits and minimal effort, while emotionally available people — who want depth, consistency, and gradual development — are systematically punished.
Coffman explains the neurological and psychological toll of relationships with emotionally unavailable partners. These individuals often present initially with love-bombing intensity, pulling emotionally available people into attachment before revealing their inability to sustain relational responsibilities. This creates cortisol spikes, micro-grief cycles, sleep disturbances, mood disorders, and nervous system dysregulation. She describes this as a kind of addiction loop — dopamine spikes followed by crashes — and argues it is far more medically harmful than commonly recognized.
The conversation explores how this creates a systemic 'race to the bottom': emotionally available people either drop out of dating entirely due to fatigue and distrust, or become emotionally damaged themselves. Coffman notes that chronic loneliness resulting from withdrawal from dating is equally harmful to the nervous system as staying in toxic situationships. She is developing a dating app specifically for emotionally available people with built-in accountability mechanisms.
Coffman introduces her 'MOP' framework for protecting oneself in early dating: Match effort (don't overinvest when chemistry hits), Observe patterns over weeks or months before attaching, and Pace access — particularly physical access — which dramatically accelerates biochemical bonding and clouds judgment. She emphasizes watching behaviors over words, and assessing emotional availability through early signals like patience with waitstaff, ability to discuss intentions, and tolerance for uncomfortable conversations without withdrawal.
The discussion covers limerence — an obsessive emotional fixation fueled by uncertainty and inconsistency — which Coffman says is far more prevalent than previously estimated (64% overall prevalence in large surveys, with 32% experiencing full person-addiction levels). Highly imaginative, empathic, anxiously attached, and introverted personality types are most vulnerable. Limerence is explained as the nervous system's attempt to create certainty out of uncertainty, often mistaken for deep love.
Coffman and host Chris Williamson discuss how the 'spark' or 'butterflies' feeling — culturally framed as positive — is actually a nervous system alarm signal indicating unpredictability, and is therefore highly predictive of relational incompatibility rather than compatibility. They draw parallels to slot machine intermittent variable reward schedules and social media dopamine mechanics.
The conversation also addresses self-abandonment, trauma, and the paradox of empathic over-givers: that their excessive kindness and accommodation is often rooted in childhood wounds where love was unpredictable, creating hypervigilant nervous systems desperate for approval. Coffman notes that society rewards this behavior as 'niceness' without recognizing its self-destructive origins. She recommends checking on 'nice friends' and doing for those who always do for others.
Finally, Coffman reframes boundary-setting not as aggression or rejection risk but as advocacy for the relationship itself — arguing that speaking up protects good relationships rather than threatening them, and that silence and self-abandonment are actually what endanger relational health.
Key Insights
- Coffman argues that emotionally unavailable people consistently outperform emotionally available people on dating apps because apps are engineered around dopamine, novelty, and minimal effort — the exact conditions that suit avoidant attachment styles and actively disadvantage those seeking depth and consistency.
- Coffman claims that the 'spark' or 'butterflies' sensation in early dating is not evidence of compatibility but rather a nervous system dysregulation signal — indicating that the person is activating uncertainty and inconsistency, which the brain misinterprets as intense romantic chemistry.
- Coffman describes limerence as the nervous system's compulsive attempt to resolve uncertainty about another person, noting large-scale surveys found 64% overall prevalence with 32% experiencing it at the level of full person-addiction — far exceeding the previously cited 5% estimate.
- Coffman argues that over-giving and excessive empathy in adults is frequently rooted in childhood environments where parental love was unpredictable, creating hypervigilant nervous systems that self-abandon in order to maintain others' approval — a behavior society labels as kindness without recognizing its wounded origin.
- Coffman contends that the wrong romantic partners are the hardest to get over not because they were the best match, but because their inconsistency and emotional unavailability created the highest dopamine and cortisol spikes — and that post-breakup obsession is the nervous system chasing certainty, not evidence of genuine love.
Topics
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to Access