This Quiz Determines If You’re Sexist
The hosts discuss the 'benevolent sexism scale' used in psychology research, arguing it fundamentally mismeasures male attitudes by conflating awareness of evolutionary facts with sexist beliefs. They explore women's strong preferences for male protection and provisioning, and debate whether these preferences are pathologized by feminist-leaning psychological scales. A viral video of a man hiding during a knife attack serves as a case study for the instinctive moral reaction to male protectiveness.
Summary
The conversation begins with a quiz testing Freya's responses to questions from the 'benevolent sexism scale,' a psychological measurement tool. Freya consistently identifies statements like 'women have superior moral sensibility' as sexist toward men, and rates protective sentiments like 'women should be cherished and protected' as good things — responses which technically classify her as a 'massive benevolent sexist' according to the scale.
Tanya introduces the concept of the 'mismeasurement of men,' a research project critiquing how psychological scales measuring toxic masculinity, benevolent sexism, and male sexual entitlement are fundamentally flawed. She argues these scales conflate factual awareness about the world — such as women being attracted to dominance and muscularity — with problematic attitudes, without properly measuring the harmful inferential leap (e.g., that protection justifies limiting women's autonomy).
The group discusses how the benevolent sexism scale pathologizes women's own preferences for protection and provisioning, noting that women are 'perplexingly attracted to benevolent sexism' in the literature, which researchers treat as an inconvenient finding rather than a reflection of genuine preferences. Tanya shares poll results showing women rated discovering a man was unwilling to protect them as more damaging to attraction than discovering he had cheated in a one-night stand.
A viral CCTV video from Thailand — showing a man hiding behind a pillar while his female companion fights off a knife-wielding attacker, before another man intervenes with a helmet — serves as a real-world illustration of universal moral intuitions about male protectiveness. The group discusses how modern life removes opportunities for men to display physical formidability, potentially contributing to women's declining interest in men.
The conversation then turns to the trade-offs involved in selecting highly aggressive, formidable mates. While women desire men capable of aggression for protection, the same trait can manifest as domestic abuse — as seen in cases involving MMA fighters. The hosts note that the ability to turn aggression on and off is rare, and that women's preference for formidable mates intensifies in more dangerous environments and among smaller women.
Key Insights
- Tanya argues that the benevolent sexism scale fundamentally mismeasures attitudes by requiring an extra, unmeasured inference — assuming that believing women deserve protection implies also believing their autonomy should be restricted — which she calls 'the Kathy Newman of scales.'
- Tanya's poll found that women reported discovering a man was unwilling to protect them would have a stronger negative effect on their attraction to him than discovering he had cheated in a one-night stand, illustrating how deeply held the preference for male protection is.
- Tanya argues that the psychological literature treats women's attraction to benevolent sexism as a puzzling inconvenience, but this reflects a failure to distinguish between preferring protection and endorsing paternalistic control — a distinction the scale never properly measures.
- The hosts suggest that modern life removes contexts — such as war or hunting — in which men historically displayed physical formidability, and speculate this may be a contributing factor to women's declining romantic interest in men.
- The group discusses how selecting for highly formidable, aggressive men creates a trade-off: the same aggression that makes a man a strong protector is difficult to turn off, which may explain why domestic abuse cases are disproportionately reported among MMA fighters and similarly trained men.
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] On the topic of sexism, Freya, I'd like to put you on the spot a bit at the moment. I would include you. Well, we'll see. I want to ask you a few questions where you've been described as the voice of Gen Z women. Uh, so this will be very interesting h to get your opinion on these questions. So, I'm going to read them out to you. So, Tanya, I already know what you think because we're we're working on this together. So, is it closer to sexist towards men or women to believe the following things? One, women have a superior moral sensibility. [0:33] >> Uh, sexist toward men, I would say. >> Okay. Women have…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Chris Williamson
The 5 Step Process To Manipulate A Confession - Chase Hughes
Chase Hughes explains a five-step interrogation protocol used to elicit confessions, breaking down each stage from socialization to an alternative question that forces an admission of guilt. He also discusses diagnostic 'bait' and 'punishment' questions used to assess guilt before moving into the confession methodology, illustrating the latter with a personal anecdote about his children and spilled chocolate milk.
Embrace Your Current Life
The speaker reflects on the idea that we often wanted the life we currently have, yet remain unsatisfied. Drawing from personal experience of being happy both in poverty and wealth, they conclude that external circumstances have little bearing on inner contentment.
What Happens If The Population Shrinks?
This transcript discusses the effects of population decline, noting that it doesn't result in uniformly smaller towns but rather in the complete disappearance of less desirable small towns. Young people and long-term planners migrate toward large 'magnet cities' where jobs are concentrated. This filtering effect accelerates the decline of smaller, less competitive areas.
You Will Always Be Enough
The speaker reflects on what they would tell their younger self, emphasizing that personal greatness is not a requirement for a fulfilling life. The core message is that simply being oneself is always sufficient. Authentic self-expression is framed as inherently valuable, regardless of external achievement.
Battle The Things That Matter Most
The speaker argues that perfectionists must strategically choose which areas to apply their high standards to. Spreading perfectionism across everything leads to slow progress, so focusing on the highest-contribution areas is essential for meaningful advancement.