California is Determined to Protect It’s Fraud
The hosts discuss California's 'Stop Nick Shirley Act,' a proposed bill that critics argue would restrict investigative journalism by limiting the release of videos exposing fraud. The conversation expands to cover similar transparency rollbacks in Puerto Rico, where a financial oversight board has allegedly funneled billions in taxpayer money to Wall Street consultants.
Summary
The conversation opens with the hosts discussing California's proposed 'Stop Nick Shirley Act,' named after an investigative journalist known for exposing fraud in Minnesota and Puerto Rico. The bill, as read aloud, would prohibit publicly posting or distributing personal information about healthcare providers or patients with intent to incite harm or threats. The hosts argue this legislation is being framed as a protection measure but is actually designed to shield fraudulent activity from public scrutiny.
One host connects the bill to Nick Shirley's prior investigations into Somali learning centers in Minnesota, suggesting California lawmakers are preemptively passing legislation to prevent similar exposés from occurring there. The hosts push back on the stated justification — that exposing fraud endangers immigrant communities — arguing that the real solution would be to stop the fraud itself, or to address violence through existing laws against assault.
The discussion then pivots to Puerto Rico, where one host describes his own investigative journalism work. He explains that in 2016, Congress under Obama approved a financial oversight board that now effectively functions as a shadow government for Puerto Rico. Approximately $2 billion in Puerto Rican taxpayer money has allegedly been funneled to Wall Street consultants, executives, and attorneys to manage the island's bankruptcy proceedings. The Puerto Rican Electric Power Authority (PREPA) was privatized under a company called Luma, resulting in unreliable and expensive electricity — one resident hadn't had power for eight years.
The host also notes that Puerto Rico recently rolled back portions of its Transparency Act, changing FOIA-style request rules so that the identity of the requester is now visible to the agency being investigated. The hosts frame this as a deliberate effort to intimidate investigative journalists. They conclude by drawing a parallel between Puerto Rico's transparency rollback and California's proposed bill, arguing both are attempts by institutions to insulate themselves from public accountability.
Key Insights
- The hosts argue that California's Stop Nick Shirley Act is framed as protecting immigrants from harassment but is functionally designed to prevent investigators from exposing fraud, claiming the real protection would come from stopping the fraud in the first place.
- One host claims that since 2016, a Congress-approved financial oversight board has funneled roughly $2 billion in Puerto Rican taxpayer money off the island to Wall Street consultants and attorneys managing the island's bankruptcy.
- The host argues Puerto Rico's situation — with unreliable, expensive electricity and billions drained to Wall Street — may represent an even worse case of institutional fraud than the Somali daycare story that made Nick Shirley famous.
- Puerto Rico recently amended its Transparency Act to reveal the identity of FOIA requesters to the agencies being investigated, which the host says will allow institutions to selectively deny requests from known critics.
- The host states that if California's Stop Nick Shirley Act were to pass, it would effectively prevent him from doing his job as an investigative journalist.
Topics
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to Access