OpinionStory

This is why you always challenge PSA pricing

Boston Card Hunter

A PSA customer whose card was damaged during grading received an unfair insurance settlement of $600 for a PSA 10 card valued at $925. After challenging PSA's pricing comparables with evidence of a $775 sale, the offer was increased to $500 maximum insured value, illustrating the importance of disputing PSA valuations.

Summary

The transcript describes a case where PSA damaged a trading card during the grading process, downgrading it from a PSA 10 to a PSA 9. Rather than regrading, PSA offered to credit the customer the difference between grades and waive the grading fee. However, the initial settlement offer was problematic: PSA's own data showed the PSA 10 was worth $925, yet they assigned only $600 to the damaged card—approximately 70% of the stated value. The customer reached out for advice on how to proceed. Upon investigation, a comparable PSA 10 sale was found selling for $775, which exceeded PSA's $600 valuation. The speaker advised the customer to challenge PSA's pricing comparables, a right that customers possess. PSA's pricing department subsequently reviewed the case and acknowledged that recent market activity placed comparable PSA 9 examples at $240-$260, and agreed to consider the $775 PSA 10 sale the customer provided. Following this challenge, PSA increased their offer to $500, which represents the maximum insured value but still falls short of the original $925 valuation. The speaker concludes by emphasizing that customers should always challenge PSA on their comparable values, pricing decisions, and upcharges.

Key Insights

  • PSA assigned a $600 value to a damaged card when their own data showed the undamaged PSA 10 was worth $925, representing only 70% of the stated value in their settlement offer
  • A comparable PSA 10 sale was found in the market for $775, which directly contradicted PSA's $600 valuation and provided evidence to challenge their pricing
  • Customers have the explicit right to challenge PSA's pricing comparables and can dispute the valuations assigned to their damaged cards
  • After the customer challenged the comparables with market evidence, PSA's pricing department increased the offer from $600 to $500 (the maximum insured value) while acknowledging recent market activity
  • PSA's pricing department cited $240-$260 range for comparable PSA 9 examples despite initially offering $600 for the downgraded card, suggesting inconsistent valuation methodology

Topics

PSA card grading damage and insurance claimsPricing valuation disputes and comparablesCustomer rights to challenge PSA decisionsMarket value discrepancies in card gradingInsurance settlement negotiations

Transcript

[0:00] Pay damaged this guy's card and instead of a 10, it became a nine. So, they decided to credit him the difference between the grades and wave the grading fee. Problem is, they were only giving him about 70% of what they said the PSA 10 was worth. So, you see their own data here saying 925. They assigned a $600 value to it. So, the guy emails me. He's like, "What do I do?" He found a PSA 10 that sold for $775, which is definitely over 600. I told him, "Challenge the comp." Which, by the way, you are allowed to do. Challenge the comps. Then they came back and said, "During our review, the pricing department…

Full transcript available for MurmurCast members

Sign Up to Access

More from Boston Card Hunter

Get AI summaries like this delivered to your inbox daily

Get AI summaries delivered to your inbox

MurmurCast summarizes your YouTube channels, podcasts, and newsletters into one daily email digest.