Elon was quietly building THIS BUSINESS all along...
The speaker analyzes Elon Musk's strategic business moves, particularly the emergence of EWS (Elon's cloud/compute service), which he estimates will generate $4-5 billion in incremental revenue this year. SpaceX is described as a five-layer business stack, and Musk's allocation of H100 compute to Anthropic is framed as a savvy monetization strategy. The speaker argues this reduces pressure on x.ai to generate immediate revenue while positioning Musk as a major hyperscale competitor.
Summary
The speaker opens by praising Elon Musk's unique ability to convert energy (electrons) into compute tokens, framing this as a critically important evolution in his business narrative. SpaceX is described as a five-layer business model encompassing launch, connectivity, compute, hyperscaler/space data centers, applications and models, and other bets.
The central revelation is that Musk has been quietly building EWS (an enterprise/cloud compute service), which the speaker views as Musk's 'ace card.' This business is projected to generate an incremental $4-5 billion in revenue this year, significantly above analyst estimates in the mid-$20 billion range — representing a material upside that offsets the cost of Musk's capital investments.
The speaker notes that Musk operates three AI compute facilities — Colossus, MacroHard, and MacroHarder — with MacroHard and MacroHarder housing 1.2 gigawatts of Blackwell GPU infrastructure. The decision to allocate the relatively less-connected H100 cluster to Anthropic is highlighted as a strategic and financially shrewd move, beneficial to both parties.
Critically, this revenue stream alleviates pressure on x.ai to generate immediate returns, as the compute monetization can subsidize next-generation Grok development. The speaker concludes by suggesting this is likely not the last major announcement and reflects confidence in American capitalism's ability to resolve concerns around power, compute scarcity, and revenue timing.
Key Insights
- The speaker argues that Musk has been secretly building EWS all along, framing it as a strategically concealed 'ace card' that is now being revealed as a major revenue-generating business.
- The speaker estimates EWS will generate an incremental $4-5 billion in revenue this year, on top of analyst consensus estimates already in the mid-$20 billion range — a significant upside surprise.
- The speaker claims Musk gave Anthropic access to his H100 cluster — described as 'less connected' and great for inference — effectively monetizing underutilized infrastructure while benefiting Anthropic.
- The speaker argues the EWS revenue solves what he considered the biggest valuation risk for x.ai: the possibility that Musk would spend ahead of x.ai's revenue, as compute monetization now subsidizes Grok's next-generation development.
- The speaker describes three AI compute facilities — Colossus, MacroHard, and MacroHarder — with MacroHard and MacroHarder collectively representing 1.2 gigawatts of Blackwell GPU capacity.
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] There's nobody better on planet Earth than Elon at converting electrons to tokens. It's a critically important evolution to the story. SpaceX has this five-layer cake, launch, connectivity, compute, hyperscaler, space data centers, and then applications and models, and then other bets. And now we see the ace card that Elon's playing. He was building EWS all along. And so I estimate that this going to generate in this year an incremental 4 to 5 billion [0:30] dollars of revenue on top of what I have seen analyst estimates in the mid-20s. That's a material amount of incremental revenue to offset the cost of the investments that he's made here, and that will subsidize, to Chamath's point, all that…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from All-In Podcast
David Friedberg: California’s Voting System Looks Fraudulent, But It’s Working Exactly as Designed
David Friedberg analyzes statistical anomalies in Los Angeles election results, particularly around mail-in ballot patterns for Nithya Raman and Karen Bass. He argues that California's ballot harvesting laws and universal mail-in ballot system, while technically legal, create conditions where elections can be manipulated by organized collection efforts rather than reflecting genuine individual voter intent.
All-In's Best Ideas Pitch Competition: 4 Investors Present Their Top Trades Live
The All-In Best Ideas Pitch Competition features four investors presenting their top trade ideas: Aaron Cowen pitching MGM Resorts, Dan Dreifus pitching Talon Energy, Oleg Nodelman pitching Actis Oncology (AKTS), and Kyle Samani pitching Geonet (GEOD) token. The audience voted Talon Energy as the winner, while the besties panel ranked MGM first. The event was modeled after a similar investor pitch competition started in honor of Ira Sone.
Dan Dreyfus: The Next AI Bottleneck is Copper
Dan Dreyfus of Fortnite Capital argues that copper and critical minerals represent the next major bottleneck in the AI and re-industrialization boom. He contends that decades of underinvestment in US infrastructure, combined with China's grip on critical mineral supply chains, creates a severe supply-demand mismatch. Commodity cycles in copper and silver are just beginning and could last 15+ years with hundreds of percent upside.
Bill Maris: How Google Could Crush AI Competitors, Why Small Funds Win, and AI's Atari Stage
Bill Maris, founder of Google Ventures and Section 32, shares four lessons from his career spanning data center startups to venture capital, arguing that small funds outperform large ones. He discusses AI's current 'Atari stage,' Google's potential to crush competitors like OpenAI by slashing token prices, and the problematic incentive structures in modern venture capital.
Palo Alto Networks CEO: "AI Found 5 Years of Bugs in 6 Weeks"
Palo Alto Networks CEO Nikesh Arora discusses how AI is transforming cybersecurity, revealing that Claude (Mythos) found 5-7 years worth of code vulnerabilities in just 6 weeks. He also shares his views on the death of analytical SaaS, the future of enterprise software, and the race between AI-powered cyber defenders and attackers.