Your Competitor Is Cheaper”
The speaker addresses the objection that a competitor is cheaper by reframing the conversation around risk-adjusted return. Rather than focusing on price alone, they argue that a lower-cost option carries greater risk of failing to deliver results. The penny stock vs. Apple stock analogy is used to illustrate this point.
Summary
In this brief transcript, the speaker tackles a common sales objection: that a competitor offers a lower price. Rather than conceding or defending on price alone, the speaker reframes the entire comparison around the concept of risk-adjusted return.
The core argument is that while a competitor may indeed cost less, they are also less likely to help the customer achieve their goal. This means the cheaper option is not necessarily the smarter financial decision — it is actually a riskier one when outcomes are factored in.
To make this concrete, the speaker uses a financial analogy: comparing a penny stock to Apple stock. A penny stock is cheaper to buy and theoretically offers a higher upside (e.g., 100x return), but the probability of achieving that return is extremely low. Apple stock, while more expensive, offers a much more reliable path to a solid return, such as 10%. The speaker argues that the risk-adjusted return favors the more expensive, more reliable option — and suggests this is exactly how customers should think about choosing between vendors.
Key Insights
- The speaker argues that the relevant comparison is not price alone but risk-adjusted return — a cheaper competitor is also less likely to help the customer hit their goal.
- The speaker reframes a cheaper competitor as a riskier choice, not a safer or smarter one, because lower cost correlates with lower probability of success.
- The speaker uses a penny stock vs. Apple stock analogy to illustrate that a lower-priced option with higher theoretical upside can still be the inferior risk-adjusted investment.
- The speaker explicitly acknowledges that yes, there is always someone cheaper, but positions this acknowledgment as the starting point for reframing rather than a concession.
- The speaker suggests that a 10% return on a reliable investment (Apple) represents better risk-adjusted value than a potential 100x return on an unreliable one (penny stock), directly mirroring how vendor selection should be evaluated.
Topics
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to Access