Stop Saying "Learn"
The speaker argues against using the word 'learn' because it has negative connotations and creates an unwanted teacher-student dynamic. They prefer to 'show' people things rather than 'teaching' them, as it's more effective and less hierarchical.
Summary
The speaker presents a strong critique of the word 'learn' and its implications for communication and teaching. They identify two main problems with the term: first, it carries negative associations that remind people of formal schooling and makes the process feel like work, creating resistance. Second, using 'learn' positions the speaker as a teacher in a hierarchical relationship, which they find uncomfortable and prefer to avoid. Instead of adopting a teaching stance with phrases like 'let me learn you some things,' the speaker advocates for a more collaborative approach where they simply share discoveries and insights they've gathered. They believe that 'showing' people things is more effective than traditional teaching methods because it allows for natural observation and understanding without the baggage of formal educational structures. This approach transforms the dynamic from instructor-student to peer-to-peer sharing, making the exchange of information feel more organic and less intimidating.
Key Insights
- The speaker claims that 'learn' is a terrible verb because it's painful and reminds people of school
- The speaker argues that 'learn' sounds like work, creating negative associations
- The speaker states that 'learn' assumes a teacher-student relationship that they dislike being in
- The speaker prefers saying 'I up a bunch of here. Check it out' rather than positioning themselves as a teacher
- The speaker believes showing someone something is much easier and more effective than teaching them
Topics
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to Access