InsightfulOpinion

"How Do I Deal With Negative Reviews?"

Alex Hormozi

A business owner asks how to handle a negative one-star review they believe is undeserved. The advice given focuses on two strategies: responding with over-the-top agreement and empathy to defuse the situation, and burying the negative review by generating a high volume of positive reviews through incentivized customer engagement.

Summary

A small business owner reaches out frustrated after receiving their first one-star review, where the customer falsely accused their staff of being rude. The owner has struggled to draft a response that doesn't come across as defensive or overly apologetic to someone they feel is being unreasonable, and fears going viral for the wrong reasons.

The advice provided outlines two immediate actions. The first is to 'escalate and bury' through the public response. Rather than defending the business, the recommended approach is to fully agree with the customer's complaint and express extreme concern — essentially performing visible distress over the negative experience. The reasoning is that this leaves the complaining customer with no room to escalate further and forces them into a de-escalating role. The response should frame the business owner as someone genuinely losing sleep over the issue.

The second strategy is to bury the negative review through volume. Instead of asking customers to flood the review platform artificially, the advice is to organically integrate review solicitation into the existing customer journey — for example, by offering expedited service in exchange for leaving a review. The core argument is that a business with 1,000 reviews at a 4.6 rating is far more credible than one with a single five-star review, and that the occasional one-star outlier becomes statistically insignificant when overall review volume is high.

Key Insights

  • Alex argues that the only effective public response to a negative review is full agreement combined with exaggerated empathy, because it removes any avenue for the reviewer to escalate further and forces them to de-escalate instead.
  • Alex claims that a business owner's response should perform extreme visible distress — 'losing sleep' — over the complaint, regardless of how unjustified the review actually is, because the response exists for the court of general public opinion, not the individual reviewer.
  • Alex distinguishes between artificially soliciting reviews ('hey everybody go do that') and building review generation organically into the customer journey, such as offering expedited service in exchange for leaving a review.
  • Alex contends that a business with 1,000 reviews at a 4.6 rating is more trustworthy to consumers than a business with a single five-star review, arguing that volume is ultimately what drives public belief.
  • Alex frames the one-star outlier review as an inevitable and statistically negligible outcome when review volume is high enough, suggesting the missing 0.4 points in a 4.6 rating is simply the cost of doing business at scale.

Topics

Responding to negative online reviewsReputation management for small businessesGenerating positive reviews to offset negative ones

Full transcript available for MurmurCast members

Sign Up to Access

Get AI summaries like this delivered to your inbox daily

Get AI summaries delivered to your inbox

MurmurCast summarizes your YouTube channels, podcasts, and newsletters into one daily email digest.