"How Do I Deal With Negative Reviews?"
A business owner asks how to handle a negative one-star review they believe is undeserved. The advice given focuses on two strategies: responding with over-the-top agreement and empathy to defuse the situation, and burying the negative review by generating a high volume of positive reviews through incentivized customer engagement.
Summary
A small business owner reaches out frustrated after receiving their first one-star review, where the customer falsely accused their staff of being rude. The owner has struggled to draft a response that doesn't come across as defensive or overly apologetic to someone they feel is being unreasonable, and fears going viral for the wrong reasons.
The advice provided outlines two immediate actions. The first is to 'escalate and bury' through the public response. Rather than defending the business, the recommended approach is to fully agree with the customer's complaint and express extreme concern — essentially performing visible distress over the negative experience. The reasoning is that this leaves the complaining customer with no room to escalate further and forces them into a de-escalating role. The response should frame the business owner as someone genuinely losing sleep over the issue.
The second strategy is to bury the negative review through volume. Instead of asking customers to flood the review platform artificially, the advice is to organically integrate review solicitation into the existing customer journey — for example, by offering expedited service in exchange for leaving a review. The core argument is that a business with 1,000 reviews at a 4.6 rating is far more credible than one with a single five-star review, and that the occasional one-star outlier becomes statistically insignificant when overall review volume is high.
Key Insights
- Alex argues that the only effective public response to a negative review is full agreement combined with exaggerated empathy, because it removes any avenue for the reviewer to escalate further and forces them to de-escalate instead.
- Alex claims that a business owner's response should perform extreme visible distress — 'losing sleep' — over the complaint, regardless of how unjustified the review actually is, because the response exists for the court of general public opinion, not the individual reviewer.
- Alex distinguishes between artificially soliciting reviews ('hey everybody go do that') and building review generation organically into the customer journey, such as offering expedited service in exchange for leaving a review.
- Alex contends that a business with 1,000 reviews at a 4.6 rating is more trustworthy to consumers than a business with a single five-star review, arguing that volume is ultimately what drives public belief.
- Alex frames the one-star outlier review as an inevitable and statistically negligible outcome when review volume is high enough, suggesting the missing 0.4 points in a 4.6 rating is simply the cost of doing business at scale.
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] Hey, Alex. I own a small business and I got my first really nasty one-star review this week. The customer said my staff were rude. They weren't. This person was genuinely unreasonable. And now I'm sitting here drafting a response for the third time because every version either sounds defensive or like I'm graveling to someone who doesn't deserve it. I've seen business owner responses go viral for the wrong reasons and I'm terrified of being that guy. Do you respond to every negative review or do you ever just leave them? There's two things that you can do immediately. So [0:30] number one is you escalate and then you bury. There's no good response to negative review besides…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Alex Hormozi
Why His Close Rate Won't Budge...
A business owner running a marketing and sales company struggles with a low close rate on sales calls, where prospects either can't afford the first payment or can't get financing approved. The advisor suggests the issue may be a lead qualification problem rather than a sales problem. Adding funnel qualifications is proposed as the key solution to improve profitability.
How I Define Culture In An Organisation
The speaker defines organizational culture as the spoken and unspoken rules that govern reinforcement — determining what gets rewarded, ignored, or punished. They outline two approaches to codifying culture: a comprehensive rule-based codification or a faster values-based approach using a few core statements. Values are described as 'chunked up rules' that, when unpacked, reveal underlying behaviors.
Your Competitor Is Cheaper”
The speaker addresses the objection that a competitor is cheaper by reframing the conversation around risk-adjusted return. Rather than focusing on price alone, they argue that a lower-cost option carries greater risk of failing to deliver results. The penny stock vs. Apple stock analogy is used to illustrate this point.
Profit Is Unnatural
A mentor described as a 70-something year old billionaire shared the counterintuitive idea that profit is unnatural. He argued that businesses naturally drift toward spending away their profits over time, and that maintaining profitability requires deliberate, ruthless expense control by a dedicated person.
My Founder Story
Alex Hormozi recounts his entrepreneurial journey from a consulting job to building a portfolio of companies generating over $250 million in aggregate annual revenue. He details his failures, pivots, and major exits, including selling Gym Launch and Prestige Labs for $46.2 million. The transcript serves as both a personal origin story and a pitch for his brand, acquisition.com.