Claude Code-Opus 4.5 V/S GPT-5.2 Codex V/S GLM-4.7 V/S MiniMax M2!

AISeeKing3m 29s

The video compares AI coding models after Claude Code cracked down on third-party interfaces, concluding that GPT 5.2 Codex is unreliable and slow despite official OpenAI integration. The speaker recommends GLM 4.7 and MiniMax as better alternatives due to superior performance and cost-effectiveness.

Summary

The video begins by discussing the controversy surrounding Anthropic's Claude Code max plan cracking down on users accessing their subscription through third-party interfaces like Open Code, which upset many users. This led to discussions about whether GPT 5.2 Codex could serve as a viable alternative, especially since OpenAI has now officially integrated with Open Code, offering stable access through ChatGPT subscriptions at flat rates similar to Claude Code. However, the speaker strongly criticizes GPT 5.2 Codex, describing it as unreliable, lacking knowledge of many libraries, and extremely slow, making it frustrating for quick edits while costing the same as Claude. Instead, the speaker enthusiastically recommends GLM 4.7, claiming it surpasses GPT 5.2 Codex in speed, cost-effectiveness, language support, and accuracy, while also being better at design. The GLM coding plan offers exceptional value at $288 for a yearly max plan, equivalent to just 1.5 months of OpenAI or Claude subscriptions, and includes free MCPs for web search and vision tools. The video also mentions MiniMax as another strong alternative that can implement plans created by better models in seconds, and suggests synthetic subscriptions for access to multiple open models with good limits.

Key Insights

  • The speaker claims GPT 5.2 Codex is extremely unreliable, doesn't know many libraries, and is frustratingly slow for quick edits while costing the same as Claude
  • The speaker argues GLM 4.7 is superior to GPT 5.2 Codex in every meaningful way, being faster, cheaper, better with every programming language, and making fewer errors
  • The speaker states GLM's yearly max plan costs $288, which equals only 1.5 months of OpenAI or Claude subscriptions, making it exceptionally cost-effective

Topics

AI coding model comparisonClaude Code subscription controversyGPT 5.2 Codex limitationsGLM 4.7 advantagesCost analysis of AI coding services

Full transcript available for MurmurCast members

Sign Up to Access

Get AI summaries like this delivered to your inbox daily

Get AI summaries delivered to your inbox

MurmurCast summarizes your YouTube channels, podcasts, and newsletters into one daily email digest.